[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fw_cfg: RQFN rules, documentation
From: |
Laszlo Ersek |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fw_cfg: RQFN rules, documentation |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Apr 2016 19:14:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 |
On 04/04/16 17:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> ... My question is, do we need the "opt/" prefix at all (for the future,
>> i.e., the non-historical cases)?
>> Looking at the last discussion, I
>> believe we converged on:
>>
>> - QEMU devs (future filenames): org.qemu/...
>> - users: com.my_company/...
>> - QEMU fw devs (future names): org.tianocore.edk2.ovmf/...
>> org.seabios/...
>> - QEMU fw devs hacking: <root-prefix-to-strip>/...
>>
>> Did you find something unsafe about this (necessitating "opt/")?
>>
>
> The reason to use the opt/ prefix is to avoid warning
> with QEMU 2.4 and 2.5.
Sorry, it's been a long day :), and I don't understand your answer. Can
you please spell it out for me? How are QEMU 2.4 and 2.5 related to this
discussion?
Thanks!
Laszlo