qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] "x-disable-pcie" virtio-pci property in compat_props (H


From: Laurent Vivier
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] "x-disable-pcie" virtio-pci property in compat_props (HW_COMPAT_2_4)
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 11:09:07 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0


On 10/02/2016 10:52, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On 02/09/2016 07:38 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm playing with a qemu-2.5.0 and pc-i440fx-2.4 machine type, and
>> perhaps I don't understand correctly the compat_props machinery but
>> there is something strange for me:
>>
>> in qemu-2.5.0, hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c:
>>
>>     1880     DEFINE_PROP_BIT("x-disable-pcie", VirtIOPCIProxy, flags,
>>     1881                     VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_DISABLE_PCIE_BIT, false),
>>
>> So I guess a new default machine (pc-i440fx-2.5) will be defined by
>> default with "x-disable-pcie" set to "false".
> 
> Correct, but we are talking about both pc and q35.
> By default, virtio devices *can be* PCIe for all new machines.
> 
>>
>> and in qemu-2.5, include/hw/compat.h:
>>
>>        3
>>        4 #define HW_COMPAT_2_4 \
>>        5         {\
>> ..
>>       14             .driver   = "virtio-pci",\
>>       15             .property = "x-disable-pcie",\
>>       16             .value    = "on",\
>>       17         },{\
>>
>> So I guess a new machine pc-i440fx-2.4 created with qemu-2.5.0 will have
>> "x-disable-pcie" set to true (as with qemu-2.4.0 this feature is not
>> available).
> 
> Exactly, machines before 2.5 will not have virtio devices PCIe
> Old q35 machines are also included.
> 
>>
>> But in this case "x-disable-pcie" is always set to "false".
> 
> For older machines yes, for newer no.
> 
>>
>> So the questions are:
>> - do I understand correctly?
> 
> Does the above respond to your question?
> 
>> - I check "x-disable-pcie" for "virtio-*-pci" devices (virtio-net-pci,
>> virtio-balloon-pci, ..."), should they inherit the behavior from their
>> parent "virtio-pci"? (they should, as virtio-pci is an abstract device
>> type)
> 
> Yes, they do inherit this property.
> 
>>
>> My test:
>>
>> - take qemu-2.5.0 (a8c40fa Update version for v2.5.0 release)
>> - start it with "-M pc-i440fx-2.5 -device virtio-balloon-pci -S",
>>    "info qtree":
>>
>>      bus: pci.0
>>        type PCI
>>        dev: virtio-balloon-pci, id ""
>> ...
>>          x-disable-pcie = false
> 
> This is correct again.
> 
>>
>> - start it with "-M pc-i440fx-2.4 -device virtio-balloon-pci -S",
>>    "info qtree":
>>
>>      bus: pci.0
>>        type PCI
>>        dev: virtio-balloon-pci, id ""
>> ...
>>          x-disable-pcie = false
> 
> This is a bug! Thanks for finding it.
> It took a little but I found the root cause.
> 
> We have 2 virtio features mapped into the same bit:
> - #define VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_MIGRATE_EXTRA_BIT 4
> - #define VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_DISABLE_PCIE_BIT 4
> 
> Since both properties appear in HW_COMPAT_2_4, but
> migrate-extra is the last one used, it wins the race.
> 
> 
> To the obvious question of "how did that happen?" I can say we had an
> unlucky break.
> Both Jason and me worked on a new different virtio feature in the same
> time,
> and they were both merged in the same pull request.
> We both saw BIT 3 as the last used :)
> 
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-11/msg03041.html
> 
> I'll send a patch to map virtio pcie feature to a different  bit.
> Thanks,

Thank you Marcel!

You have answered to all my questions and find a fix. This is perfect :)

Laurent



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]