qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] m68k: Build the opcode table only once to a


From: Laurent Vivier
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] m68k: Build the opcode table only once to avoid multithreading issues
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 10:57:07 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0


Le 03/02/2016 10:39, Laurent Vivier a écrit :
> 
> 
> Le 03/02/2016 10:37, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
>> Signed-off-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  target-m68k/translate.c | 4 ++++
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/target-m68k/translate.c b/target-m68k/translate.c
>> index 535d7f9..f508d1e 100644
>> --- a/target-m68k/translate.c
>> +++ b/target-m68k/translate.c
>> @@ -2828,6 +2828,10 @@ register_opcode (disas_proc proc, uint16_t opcode, 
>> uint16_t mask)
>>     Later insn override earlier ones.  */
>>  void register_m68k_insns (CPUM68KState *env)
>>  {
>> +    /* Build the opcode table only once to avoid
>> +       issues with multithreading. */
>> +    if(opcode_table[0] != NULL)
>> +       return;
>>  #define INSN(name, opcode, mask, feature) do { \
>>      if (m68k_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_##feature)) \
>>          register_opcode(disas_##name, 0x##opcode, 0x##mask); \
>>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <address@hidden>

In fact, the line should be:

+    if (opcode_table[0] != NULL)
+        return;

thanks to scripts/checkpatch.pl.

Laurent



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]