[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v4 00/52] Ivshmem patches
From: |
Marc-André Lureau |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v4 00/52] Ivshmem patches |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:06:46 +0100 |
Hi
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Peter Maydell
<address@hidden> wrote:
> This will print a cryptic error message and then not fail the test,
> which is not great. Maybe that's ok for the moment in the interests
> of not keeping this huge patchset out of tree for too long[*], but
> we should look at what glib's test framework provides in the way
> of being able to report "skipped this test" outcomes.
g_test_skip() is since 2.38 (and can't be added in compat, because it
uses internal variable etc)
Furthermore, the shm error is a precondition for all the tests, it
doesn't fit well with g_test_skip() which is inside the individual
unit tests.
> [*] Incidentally this whole saga demonstrates why my general
> recommendation is to keep pull requests at much less than
> 50 patches...
>
>> I rebased and updated the tag.
>
> If you mean by this "please retry the pull" you should send a fresh
> coverletter email so my scripts will pick it up...
ok
--
Marc-André Lureau
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v4 00/52] Ivshmem patches, Peter Maydell, 2015/10/19