[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 15/18] qapi: Move duplicate member checks to
From: |
Markus Armbruster |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 15/18] qapi: Move duplicate member checks to schema check() |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:32:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:
> On 10/13/2015 11:13 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>> I've come to the conclusion that we should get rid of the self-inflicted
>>>> pain before we attempt to detect all collisions.
>>>
>>> Then that sounds like I should try harder to get the kind/type naming,
>>> the boxed base naming, and even the anonymous union naming all hoisted
>>> into this subset, and spin a v9?
>>
>> I can take PATCH 01-09,12 into my tree right away, with PATCH 07's two
>> redundant is_implicit() methods dropped, and PATCH 12's comment touched
>> up.
>
> Okay.
Done & pushed to http://repo.or.cz/qemu/armbru.git branch qapi-next.
>>
>> I could take PATCH 10, but let's at least try to make a plan for
>> c_name() first. If we fail, I'll take the patch, perhaps less the % to
>> + change, and we'll revisit c_name() later when we see more clearly.
>
> At this point, I'm not sure whether 10 disappears completely after the
> type/kind fix, so that alone is a good enough reason to leave 10 out of
> your tree for another round.
>
>>
>> You want to move PATCH 11 to later in the queue, and I like that.
>>
>> PATCH 13 needs a fix squashed in, and a few nits touched up. If you
>> want me to do that on commit, please propose a patch for me to squash
>> in. But a respin is probably easier for all.
>>
>> PATCH 14 is fine, but it depends on 13.
>>
>> I haven't finished review of PATCH 15-18.
>>
>> Taken together, I think the easiest way forward is I take 01-09,12, and
>> you respin the rest after we finish its review. Makes sense?
>>
>
> Sounds like we're agreed then: take the obvious patches into your tree,
> and let me rework the tail of this subset on top of cleanups that reduce
> self-inflicted collisions.
Yes, please. I'll try to review v8 16-18 quickly.
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 12/18] qapi: Track location that created an implicit type, (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 15/18] qapi: Move duplicate member checks to schema check(), Eric Blake, 2015/10/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 15/18] qapi: Move duplicate member checks to schema check(), Markus Armbruster, 2015/10/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 15/18] qapi: Move duplicate member checks to schema check(), Eric Blake, 2015/10/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 15/18] qapi: Move duplicate member checks to schema check(), Markus Armbruster, 2015/10/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 15/18] qapi: Move duplicate member checks to schema check(), Eric Blake, 2015/10/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 15/18] qapi: Move duplicate member checks to schema check(),
Markus Armbruster <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 15/18] qapi: Move duplicate member checks to schema check(), Eric Blake, 2015/10/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 15/18] qapi: Move duplicate member checks to schema check(), Eric Blake, 2015/10/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 15/18] qapi: Move duplicate member checks to schema check(), Markus Armbruster, 2015/10/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 15/18] qapi: Move duplicate member checks to schema check(), Markus Armbruster, 2015/10/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 15/18] qapi: Move duplicate member checks to schema check(), Eric Blake, 2015/10/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 15/18] qapi: Move duplicate member checks to schema check(), Markus Armbruster, 2015/10/14
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 18/18] qapi: Detect base class loops, Eric Blake, 2015/10/13
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 16/18] qapi: Move duplicate enum value checks to schema check(), Eric Blake, 2015/10/13