qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 25/32] nvdimm: build ACPI nvdimm devices


From: Igor Mammedov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 25/32] nvdimm: build ACPI nvdimm devices
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:39:29 +0200

On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 11:52:57 +0800
Xiao Guangrong <address@hidden> wrote:

> NVDIMM devices is defined in ACPI 6.0 9.20 NVDIMM Devices
> 
> There is a root device under \_SB and specified NVDIMM devices are under the
> root device. Each NVDIMM device has _ADR which returns its handle used to
> associate MEMDEV structure in NFIT
> 
> We reserve handle 0 for root device. In this patch, we save handle, arg0,
> arg1 and arg2. Arg3 is conditionally saved in later patch
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/mem/nvdimm/acpi.c | 203 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 203 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/mem/nvdimm/acpi.c b/hw/mem/nvdimm/acpi.c
I'd suggest to put ACPI parts to hw/acpi/nvdimm.c file so that ACPI
maintainers won't miss changes to this files.


> index 1450a6a..d9fa0fd 100644
> --- a/hw/mem/nvdimm/acpi.c
> +++ b/hw/mem/nvdimm/acpi.c
> @@ -308,15 +308,38 @@ static void build_nfit(void *fit, GSList *device_list, 
> GArray *table_offsets,
>                   "NFIT", table_data->len - nfit_start, 1);
>  }
>  
> +#define NOTIFY_VALUE      0x99
> +
> +struct dsm_in {
> +    uint32_t handle;
> +    uint8_t arg0[16];
> +    uint32_t arg1;
> +    uint32_t arg2;
> +   /* the remaining size in the page is used by arg3. */
> +    uint8_t arg3[0];
> +} QEMU_PACKED;
> +typedef struct dsm_in dsm_in;
> +
> +struct dsm_out {
> +    /* the size of buffer filled by QEMU. */
> +    uint16_t len;
> +    uint8_t data[0];
> +} QEMU_PACKED;
> +typedef struct dsm_out dsm_out;
> +
>  static uint64_t dsm_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
>                           unsigned size)
>  {
> +    fprintf(stderr, "BUG: we never read DSM notification MMIO.\n");
>      return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static void dsm_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
>                        uint64_t val, unsigned size)
>  {
> +    if (val != NOTIFY_VALUE) {
> +        fprintf(stderr, "BUG: unexepected notify value 0x%" PRIx64, val);
> +    }
>  }
>  
>  static const MemoryRegionOps dsm_ops = {
> @@ -372,6 +395,183 @@ static MemoryRegion *build_dsm_memory(NVDIMMState 
> *state)
>      return dsm_fit_mr;
>  }
>  
> +#define BUILD_STA_METHOD(_dev_, _method_)                                  \
> +    do {                                                                   \
> +        _method_ = aml_method("_STA", 0);                                  \
> +        aml_append(_method_, aml_return(aml_int(0x0f)));                   \
> +        aml_append(_dev_, _method_);                                       \
> +    } while (0)
> +
> +#define SAVE_ARG012_HANDLE_LOCK(_method_, _handle_)                        \
> +    do {                                                                   \
> +        aml_append(_method_, aml_acquire(aml_name("NLCK"), 0xFFFF));       \
how about making method serialized, then you could drop explicit lock/unlock 
logic
for that you'd need to extend existing aml_method() to something like this:

  aml_method("FOO", 3/*count*/, AML_SERIALIZED, 0 /* sync_level */)

> +        aml_append(_method_, aml_store(_handle_, aml_name("HDLE")));       \
> +        aml_append(_method_, aml_store(aml_arg(0), aml_name("ARG0")));     \
Could you describe QEMU<->ASL interface in a separate spec
file (for example like: docs/specs/acpi_mem_hotplug.txt),
it will help to with review process as there will be something to compare
patches with.
Once that is finalized/agreed upon, it should be easy to review and probably
to write corresponding patches.

Also I'd try to minimize QEMU<->ASL interface and implement as much as possible
of ASL logic in AML instead of pushing it in hardware (QEMU).
For example there isn't really any need to tell QEMU ARG0 (UUID), _DSM method
could just compare UUIDs itself and execute a corresponding branch.
Probably something else could be optimized as well but that we can find out
during discussion over QEMU<->ASL interface spec.

> +        aml_append(_method_, aml_store(aml_arg(1), aml_name("ARG1")));     \
> +        aml_append(_method_, aml_store(aml_arg(2), aml_name("ARG2")));     \
> +    } while (0)
> +
> +#define NOTIFY_AND_RETURN_UNLOCK(_method_)                           \
> +    do {                                                                   \
> +        aml_append(_method_, aml_store(aml_int(NOTIFY_VALUE),              \
> +                   aml_name("NOTI")));                                     \
> +        aml_append(_method_, aml_store(aml_name("RLEN"), aml_local(6)));   \
> +        aml_append(_method_, aml_store(aml_shiftleft(aml_local(6),         \
> +                      aml_int(3)), aml_local(6)));                         \
> +        aml_append(_method_, aml_create_field(aml_name("ODAT"), aml_int(0),\
> +                                              aml_local(6) , "OBUF"));     \
> +        aml_append(_method_, aml_name_decl("ZBUF", aml_buffer(0, NULL)));  \
> +        aml_append(_method_, aml_concatenate(aml_name("ZBUF"),             \
> +                                          aml_name("OBUF"), aml_arg(6)));  \
> +        aml_append(_method_, aml_release(aml_name("NLCK")));               \
> +        aml_append(_method_, aml_return(aml_arg(6)));                      \
> +    } while (0)
> +
> +#define BUILD_FIELD_UNIT_STRUCT(_field_, _s_, _f_, _name_)                 \
> +    aml_append(_field_, aml_named_field(_name_,                            \
> +               sizeof(typeof_field(_s_, _f_)) * BITS_PER_BYTE))
> +
> +#define BUILD_FIELD_UNIT_SIZE(_field_, _byte_, _name_)                     \
> +    aml_append(_field_, aml_named_field(_name_, (_byte_) * BITS_PER_BYTE))
> +
> +static void build_nvdimm_devices(NVDIMMState *state, GSList *device_list,
> +                                 Aml *root_dev)
> +{
> +    for (; device_list; device_list = device_list->next) {
> +        NVDIMMDevice *nvdimm = device_list->data;
> +        int slot = object_property_get_int(OBJECT(nvdimm), DIMM_SLOT_PROP,
> +                                           NULL);
> +        uint32_t handle = nvdimm_slot_to_handle(slot);
> +        Aml *dev, *method;
> +
> +        dev = aml_device("NV%02X", slot);
> +        aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_ADR", aml_int(handle)));
> +
> +        BUILD_STA_METHOD(dev, method);
> +
> +        method = aml_method("_DSM", 4);
That will create the same method per each device which increases
ACPI table size unnecessarily.
I'd suggest to make per nvdimm device method a wrapper over common
NVDR._DSM method and make the later handle all the logic.

> +        {
> +            SAVE_ARG012_HANDLE_LOCK(method, aml_int(handle));
> +            NOTIFY_AND_RETURN_UNLOCK(method);
> +        }
> +        aml_append(dev, method);
> +
> +        aml_append(root_dev, dev);
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +static void nvdimm_build_acpi_devices(NVDIMMState *state, GSList 
> *device_list,
> +                                      Aml *sb_scope)
> +{
> +    Aml *dev, *method, *field;
> +    int fit_size = nvdimm_device_structure_size(g_slist_length(device_list));
> +
> +    dev = aml_device("NVDR");
> +    aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_string("ACPI0012")));
> +
> +    /* map DSM memory into ACPI namespace. */
> +    aml_append(dev, aml_operation_region("NMIO", AML_SYSTEM_MEMORY,
> +               state->base, state->page_size));
> +    aml_append(dev, aml_operation_region("NRAM", AML_SYSTEM_MEMORY,
> +               state->base + state->page_size, state->page_size));
> +    aml_append(dev, aml_operation_region("NFIT", AML_SYSTEM_MEMORY,
> +               state->base + state->page_size * 2,
> +               memory_region_size(&state->mr) - state->page_size * 2));
> +
> +    /*
> +     * DSM notifier:
> +     * @NOTI: write value to it will notify QEMU that _DSM method is being
> +     *        called and the parameters can be found in dsm_in.
> +     *
> +     * It is MMIO mapping on host so that it will cause VM-exit then QEMU
> +     * gets control.
> +     */
> +    field = aml_field("NMIO", AML_DWORD_ACC, AML_PRESERVE);
> +    BUILD_FIELD_UNIT_SIZE(field, sizeof(uint32_t), "NOTI");
> +    aml_append(dev, field);
> +
> +    /*
> +     * DSM input:
> +     * @HDLE: store device's handle, it's zero if the _DSM call happens
> +     *        on ROOT.
> +     * @ARG0 ~ @ARG3: store the parameters of _DSM call.
> +     *
> +     * They are ram mapping on host so that these accesses never cause
> +     * VM-EXIT.
> +     */
> +    field = aml_field("NRAM", AML_DWORD_ACC, AML_PRESERVE);
> +    BUILD_FIELD_UNIT_STRUCT(field, dsm_in, handle, "HDLE");
> +    BUILD_FIELD_UNIT_STRUCT(field, dsm_in, arg0, "ARG0");
> +    BUILD_FIELD_UNIT_STRUCT(field, dsm_in, arg1, "ARG1");
> +    BUILD_FIELD_UNIT_STRUCT(field, dsm_in, arg2, "ARG2");
> +    BUILD_FIELD_UNIT_SIZE(field, state->page_size - offsetof(dsm_in, arg3),
> +                          "ARG3");
> +    aml_append(dev, field);
> +
> +    /*
> +     * DSM output:
> +     * @RLEN: the size of buffer filled by QEMU
> +     * @ODAT: the buffer QEMU uses to store the result
> +     *
> +     * Since the page is reused by both input and out, the input data
> +     * will be lost after storing new result into @RLEN and @ODAT
> +    */
> +    field = aml_field("NRAM", AML_DWORD_ACC, AML_PRESERVE);
> +    BUILD_FIELD_UNIT_STRUCT(field, dsm_out, len, "RLEN");
> +    BUILD_FIELD_UNIT_SIZE(field, state->page_size - offsetof(dsm_out, data),
> +                          "ODAT");
> +    aml_append(dev, field);
> +
> +    /* @RFIT, returned by _FIT method. */
> +    field = aml_field("NFIT", AML_DWORD_ACC, AML_PRESERVE);
> +    BUILD_FIELD_UNIT_SIZE(field, fit_size, "RFIT");
> +    aml_append(dev, field);
> +
> +    aml_append(dev, aml_mutex("NLCK", 0));
> +
> +    BUILD_STA_METHOD(dev, method);
> +
> +    method = aml_method("_DSM", 4);
> +    {
> +        SAVE_ARG012_HANDLE_LOCK(method, aml_int(0));
> +        NOTIFY_AND_RETURN_UNLOCK(method);
> +    }
> +    aml_append(dev, method);
> +
> +    method = aml_method("_FIT", 0);
> +    {
> +        aml_append(method, aml_return(aml_name("RFIT")));
> +    }
> +    aml_append(dev, method);
> +
> +    build_nvdimm_devices(state, device_list, dev);
> +
> +    aml_append(sb_scope, dev);
> +}
> +
> +static void nvdimm_build_ssdt(NVDIMMState *state, GSList *device_list,
> +                              GArray *table_offsets, GArray *table_data,
> +                              GArray *linker)
> +{
> +    Aml *ssdt, *sb_scope;
> +
> +    acpi_add_table(table_offsets, table_data);
> +
> +    ssdt = init_aml_allocator();
> +    acpi_data_push(ssdt->buf, sizeof(AcpiTableHeader));
> +
> +    sb_scope = aml_scope("\\_SB");
> +    nvdimm_build_acpi_devices(state, device_list, sb_scope);
> +
> +    aml_append(ssdt, sb_scope);
> +    /* copy AML table into ACPI tables blob and patch header there */
> +    g_array_append_vals(table_data, ssdt->buf->data, ssdt->buf->len);
> +    build_header(linker, table_data,
> +        (void *)(table_data->data + table_data->len - ssdt->buf->len),
> +        "SSDT", ssdt->buf->len, 1);
> +    free_aml_allocator();
> +}
> +
>  void nvdimm_build_acpi_table(NVDIMMState *state, GArray *table_offsets,
>                               GArray *table_data, GArray *linker)
>  {
> @@ -387,6 +587,9 @@ void nvdimm_build_acpi_table(NVDIMMState *state, GArray 
> *table_offsets,
>  
>          build_device_structure(device_list, fit);
>          build_nfit(fit, device_list, table_offsets, table_data, linker);
> +
> +        nvdimm_build_ssdt(state, device_list, table_offsets, table_data,
> +                          linker);
>          g_slist_free(device_list);
>      }
>  }




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]