[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Segfault using qemu-system-arm in smc91c111
From: |
Richard Purdie |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Segfault using qemu-system-arm in smc91c111 |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Sep 2015 08:18:05 +0100 |
On Sun, 2015-09-06 at 17:48 -0700, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Richard Purdie
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2015-09-06 at 11:37 -0700, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> > I tested an assert in _recieve() which confirms it can be called when
> > can_receive() says it isn't ready.
> >
>
> A backtrace of this would be handy.
This is the trace with my assert against smc91c111_can_receive(nc) being
false when we're in receive(), before we allocate_packet:
#0 0x00007f355f276267 in __GI_raise (address@hidden) at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:55
#1 0x00007f355f277eca in __GI_abort () at abort.c:89
#2 0x00007f355f26f03d in __assert_fail_base (fmt=0x7f355f3d1028 "%s%s%s:%u:
%s%sAssertion `%s' failed.\n%n",
address@hidden "smc91c111_can_receive(nc)",
address@hidden
"/media/build1/poky/build/tmp-lsb/work/x86_64-linux/qemu-native/2.4.0-r1/qemu-2.4.0/hw/net/smc91c111.c",
address@hidden, address@hidden <__PRETTY_FUNCTION__.26130>
"smc91c111_receive") at assert.c:92
#3 0x00007f355f26f0f2 in __GI___assert_fail (address@hidden
"smc91c111_can_receive(nc)",
address@hidden
"/media/build1/poky/build/tmp-lsb/work/x86_64-linux/qemu-native/2.4.0-r1/qemu-2.4.0/hw/net/smc91c111.c",
address@hidden, address@hidden <__PRETTY_FUNCTION__.26130> "smc91c111_receive")
at assert.c:101
#4 0x00007f3561fca4d0 in smc91c111_receive (nc=0x7f3563604d10,
buf=0x7f353c09d028 "RT", size=1514)
at
/media/build1/poky/build/tmp-lsb/work/x86_64-linux/qemu-native/2.4.0-r1/qemu-2.4.0/hw/net/smc91c111.c:680
#5 0x00007f356203058b in qemu_deliver_packet (sender=<optimised out>,
flags=<optimised out>, address@hidden "RT",
size=<optimised out>, opaque=0x7f3563604d10)
at
/media/build1/poky/build/tmp-lsb/work/x86_64-linux/qemu-native/2.4.0-r1/qemu-2.4.0/net/net.c:577
#6 0x00007f3562031eaa in qemu_net_queue_deliver (size=<optimised out>,
data=<optimised out>, flags=<optimised out>,
sender=<optimised out>, queue=0x7f3563604e70)
at
/media/build1/poky/build/tmp-lsb/work/x86_64-linux/qemu-native/2.4.0-r1/qemu-2.4.0/net/queue.c:157
#7 qemu_net_queue_flush (queue=0x7f3563604e70)
at
/media/build1/poky/build/tmp-lsb/work/x86_64-linux/qemu-native/2.4.0-r1/qemu-2.4.0/net/queue.c:254
#8 0x00007f356202fc7c in qemu_flush_or_purge_queued_packets
(nc=0x7f3563604d10, purge=<optimised out>)
at
/media/build1/poky/build/tmp-lsb/work/x86_64-linux/qemu-native/2.4.0-r1/qemu-2.4.0/net/net.c:606
#9 0x00007f3561fcacec in smc91c111_writeb (opaque=0x7f35635178f0,
offset=<optimised out>, value=128)
at
/media/build1/poky/build/tmp-lsb/work/x86_64-linux/qemu-native/2.4.0-r1/qemu-2.4.0/hw/net/smc91c111.c:382
#10 0x00007f3561fcaf84 in smc91c111_writew (opaque=0x7f35635178f0, offset=0,
value=128)
at
/media/build1/poky/build/tmp-lsb/work/x86_64-linux/qemu-native/2.4.0-r1/qemu-2.4.0/hw/net/smc91c111.c:612
#11 0x00007f3561e52cc5 in memory_region_oldmmio_write_accessor (mr=<optimised
out>, addr=<optimised out>, value=<optimised out>,
size=<optimised out>, shift=<optimised out>, mask=<optimised out>,
attrs=...)
at
/media/build1/poky/build/tmp-lsb/work/x86_64-linux/qemu-native/2.4.0-r1/qemu-2.4.0/memory.c:434
#12 0x00007f3561e5227d in access_with_adjusted_size (address@hidden,
address@hidden, address@hidden,
access_size_min=<optimised out>, access_size_max=<optimised out>,
access=0x7f3561e52c90 <memory_region_oldmmio_write_accessor>,
mr=0x7f356351bc80, attrs=...)
at
/media/build1/poky/build/tmp-lsb/work/x86_64-linux/qemu-native/2.4.0-r1/qemu-2.4.0/memory.c:506
#13 0x00007f3561e53d5b in memory_region_dispatch_write (address@hidden, addr=0,
data=128, address@hidden,
address@hidden) at
/media/build1/poky/build/tmp-lsb/work/x86_64-linux/qemu-native/2.4.0-r1/qemu-2.4.0/memory.c:1171
#14 0x00007f3561e1fc51 in address_space_rw (as=<optimised out>, addr=268500992,
attrs=..., address@hidden "\200",
len=2, address@hidden)
at
/media/build1/poky/build/tmp-lsb/work/x86_64-linux/qemu-native/2.4.0-r1/qemu-2.4.0/exec.c:2445
#15 0x00007f3561e1fda0 in address_space_write (len=<optimised out>,
buf=0x7f35572d94c0 "\200", attrs=..., addr=<optimised out>,
as=<optimised out>) at
/media/build1/poky/build/tmp-lsb/work/x86_64-linux/qemu-native/2.4.0-r1/qemu-2.4.0/exec.c:2521
#16 subpage_write (opaque=<optimised out>, addr=<optimised out>,
value=<optimised out>, len=<optimised out>, attrs=...)
at
/media/build1/poky/build/tmp-lsb/work/x86_64-linux/qemu-native/2.4.0-r1/qemu-2.4.0/exec.c:2081
#17 0x00007f3561e5227d in access_with_adjusted_size (address@hidden,
address@hidden, address@hidden,
access_size_min=<optimised out>, access_size_max=<optimised out>,
access=0x7f3561e521a0 <memory_region_write_with_attrs_accessor>,
mr=0x7f356375e360, attrs=...)
at
/media/build1/poky/build/tmp-lsb/work/x86_64-linux/qemu-native/2.4.0-r1/qemu-2.4.0/memory.c:506
#18 0x00007f3561e53d5b in memory_region_dispatch_write (mr=0x7f356375e360,
addr=0, data=128, size=2, attrs=...)
at
/media/build1/poky/build/tmp-lsb/work/x86_64-linux/qemu-native/2.4.0-r1/qemu-2.4.0/memory.c:1171
#19 0x00007f3559342734 in ?? ()
the rest of the stack is just ??. So some write into the smc91c111
memory triggers qemu_flush_or_purge_queued_packets() which then keeps
delivering packets as far as I can tell.
Do we need to check can_receive() before triggering the
qemu_flush_or_purge_queued_packets() call? The code is clearly calling
this in places where the driver simply isn't ready.
(qemu_flush_queued_packets() == qemu_flush_or_purge_queued_packets())
Cheers,
Richard
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Segfault using qemu-system-arm in smc91c111, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Segfault using qemu-system-arm in smc91c111, Richard Purdie, 2015/09/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Segfault using qemu-system-arm in smc91c111, Richard Purdie, 2015/09/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Segfault using qemu-system-arm in smc91c111, Peter Maydell, 2015/09/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Segfault using qemu-system-arm in smc91c111, Peter Crosthwaite, 2015/09/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Segfault using qemu-system-arm in smc91c111, Richard Purdie, 2015/09/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Segfault using qemu-system-arm in smc91c111, Peter Crosthwaite, 2015/09/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Segfault using qemu-system-arm in smc91c111, Richard Purdie, 2015/09/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Segfault using qemu-system-arm in smc91c111, Peter Crosthwaite, 2015/09/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Segfault using qemu-system-arm in smc91c111, Richard Purdie, 2015/09/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Segfault using qemu-system-arm in smc91c111, Peter Crosthwaite, 2015/09/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Segfault using qemu-system-arm in smc91c111,
Richard Purdie <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Segfault using qemu-system-arm in smc91c111, Richard Purdie, 2015/09/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Segfault using qemu-system-arm in smc91c111, Peter Maydell, 2015/09/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Segfault using qemu-system-arm in smc91c111, Peter Crosthwaite, 2015/09/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Segfault using qemu-system-arm in smc91c111, Jason Wang, 2015/09/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Segfault using qemu-system-arm in smc91c111, Peter Maydell, 2015/09/07