[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] Disas QOMification, round 2
From: |
Peter Crosthwaite |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] Disas QOMification, round 2 |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Aug 2015 09:19:41 -0700 |
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 28 August 2015 at 16:46, Andreas Färber <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Two to go, moxie as the next one untested by Peter.
>
> The last email on qemu-devel from the moxie maintainer was
> in 2013, so I wouldn't hold your breath.
>
It is also unfortunately the only arch I couldn't get low effort test
cases on. I can dig around to see if I can get a basic elf going to
bring it up to same level of testing as other archs if we are really
worried.
Longer term though, maybe these homogeneous every-arch change patterns
should only need a critical mass of acks from the arch maintainers for
the whole thing to go through. It's unlikely that I botched moxie with
most of the other arches reviewed, so chasing that ack from the last
maintainer might not be needed. That or a generic reviewer should be
able to ack ones like this, and it's almost candidate for trivial.
Regards,
Peter
> -- PMM
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] Disas QOMification, round 2, Peter Crosthwaite, 2015/08/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] Disas QOMification, round 2, Andreas Färber, 2015/08/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] Disas QOMification, round 2, Richard Henderson, 2015/08/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] Disas QOMification, round 2, Andreas Färber, 2015/08/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] Disas QOMification, round 2, Peter Maydell, 2015/08/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] Disas QOMification, round 2,
Peter Crosthwaite <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] Disas QOMification, round 2, Peter Maydell, 2015/08/28