|
From: | Dennis Luehring |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] Debian 7.8.0 SPARC64 on qemu - anything i can do to speedup the emulation? |
Date: | Fri, 21 Aug 2015 18:41:09 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 |
Am 21.08.2015 um 17:47 schrieb Richard Henderson:
On 08/20/2015 11:05 PM, Dennis Luehring wrote: >> > g++ src/pugixml.cpp -g -Wall -Wextra -Werror -pedantic -std=c++0x -c -MMD -MP >> > >> > tcg-indirect: ~2:46.5 >> > qemu.org-git: ~2:51.2 (worst result) >> > without-optimization: ~2:14.1 (best result) >> >> No compiler optimization? I wouldn't expect there to be much for tcg to >> optimize there -- dropping values to memory all the time doesn't leave much. > > > without-optimization means qemu.org-git release build + undefine > USE_TCG_OPTIMIZATIONS in tcg/tcg.c > or what compiler do you mean? The one for compiling the benchmark: g++ -O2.
for the overall speed comparision it is not relevant if its -O0, -O2 or -O3 as long as all my test using always the same optimization
>> These results are weird. Unoptimized less than half the speed of mainline? >> Improving optimization (with no extra work, mind) brings the results back down? > > > yep they are - it seems that the assumption of the involved developers > where speed can be improved / or slowbess comes from is not correct > how are SPARC64 benchmarks done usually? *shrug* No different than any other..
so what benchmarks are in use? are there any download/compile/installable around some sort of default qemu performance tests?
. r~
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |