qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] hw/ppc/e500.c: Fix memory leak


From: Michael Tokarev
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] hw/ppc/e500.c: Fix memory leak
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 14:57:55 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.6.0

28.05.2015 14:13, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <address@hidden>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/ppc/e500.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/e500.c b/hw/ppc/e500.c
> index c10e1b5..f74e6f2 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/e500.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/e500.c
> @@ -1027,9 +1027,11 @@ void ppce500_init(MachineState *machine, PPCE500Params 
> *params)
>                                    NULL, NULL);
>          if (kernel_size < 0) {
>              fprintf(stderr, "qemu: could not load firmware '%s'\n", 
> filename);
> +            g_free(filename);
>              exit(1);
>          }
>      }
> +    g_free(filename);

Hm.  This is probably the patch I was thinking about when saying
you _removed" g_free() before exit(), but you're _adding_ oneā€¦ ;)
My bad.

Anyway, I don't think there's any reason to add such free() before
exiting.  Second g_free() is okay, first is unnecessary.  I think.

Thanks,

/mjt



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]