qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [RFC PATCH 0/7] Fix transactional snapshot


From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [RFC PATCH 0/7] Fix transactional snapshot with virtio-blk dataplane
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 09:46:37 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 02:43:43PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 07:23:32PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > Reported by Paolo.
> > 
> > Unlike the iohandler in main loop, iothreads currently process the event
> > notifier used as virtio-blk ioeventfd in all nested aio_poll. This is 
> > dangerous
> > without proper protection, because guest requests could sneak to block layer
> > where they mustn't.
> > 
> > For example, a QMP transaction may involve multiple bdrv_drain_all() in
> > handling the list of AioContext it works on. If an aio_poll in one of the
> > bdrv_drain_all() happens to process a guest VQ kick by dispatching the
> > ioeventfd event, a new guest write is then submitted, and voila, the
> > transaction semantics is violated.
> > 
> > This series avoids this problem by disabling virtio-blk handlers during
> > bdrv_drain_all() and transactions.
> > 
> > Notes:
> > 
> > If the general approach is right, other transaction types could get the
> > blockers similarly, in next revision. And some related bdrv_drain_all() 
> > could
> > also be changed to bdrv_drain().
> > 
> > virtio-scsi-dataplane will be a bit more complicated, but still doable.  It
> > would probably need one more interface abstraction between scsi-disk, 
> > scsi-bus
> > and virtio-scsi.
> > 
> > Although other devices don't have a pause/resume callback yet, the
> > blk_check_request, which returns -EBUSY if "device io" op blocker is set, 
> > could
> > hopefully cover most cases already.
> > 
> > Timers and block jobs also generate IO, but it should be fine as long as 
> > they
> > don't change guest visible data, which is true AFAICT.
> > 
> > 
> > Fam Zheng (7):
> >   block: Add op blocker type "device IO"
> >   block: Block "device IO" during bdrv_drain and bdrv_drain_all
> >   block: Add op blocker notifier list
> >   block-backend: Add blk_op_blocker_add_notifier
> >   virtio-blk: Move complete_request to 'ops' structure
> >   virtio-blk: Don't handle output when there is "device IO" op blocker
> >   blockdev: Add "device IO" op blocker during snapshot transaction
> > 
> >  block.c                         | 20 ++++++++++++
> >  block/block-backend.c           | 10 ++++++
> >  block/io.c                      | 12 +++++++
> >  blockdev.c                      |  7 +++++
> >  hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++---
> >  hw/block/virtio-blk.c           | 69 
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  include/block/block.h           |  9 ++++++
> >  include/block/block_int.h       |  3 ++
> >  include/hw/virtio/virtio-blk.h  | 17 ++++++++--
> >  include/sysemu/block-backend.h  |  2 ++
> >  10 files changed, 174 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> Please also add a listener to nbd.c so NBD exports cannot submit I/O
> during bdrv_drain_all().

qmp_transaction probably also needs this.

Stefan

Attachment: pgppvHftKNLSQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]