qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] QJSON: Use OBJECT_CHECK


From: Luiz Capitulino
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] QJSON: Use OBJECT_CHECK
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 08:53:50 -0400

On Tue, 05 May 2015 14:43:19 +0200
Juan Quintela <address@hidden> wrote:

> Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 07:05:55PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> >> Am 25.04.2015 um 17:28 schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> >> > The QJSON code used casts to (QJSON*) directly, instead of OBJECT_CHECK.
> >> > There were even some functions using object_dynamic_cast() calls
> >> > followed by assert(), which is exactly what OBJECT_CHECK does (by
> >> > calling object_dynamic_cast_assert()).
> >> 
> >> Suggest s/OBJECT_CHECK/OBJECT_CHECK()/g everywhere for clarity.
> >
> > I assume it can be fixed during commit by whoever is going to queue it.
> >
> >> 
> >> > 
> >> > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
> >> > ---
> >> >  qjson.c | 10 +++++-----
> >> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber <address@hidden>
> >> 
> >> Wasn't aware QJSON is using QOM - assuming this will go through some
> >> QAPI/QMP tree.
> >
> > The only user of qjson.c right now is migration code. Should it go through
> > the migration tree?
> 
> 
> I will take it, but I trust your reviews-by O:-)

I've already applied this one to the QMP tree.

> 
> >
> > Also, why do we have two JSON writers in QEMU? And why do they have
> > exactly the same name?
> 
> Alex?  I guess alex have this implementation when he did the code long
> ago?
> 
> Later, Juan.
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]