[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] QJSON: Use OBJECT_CHECK
From: |
Luiz Capitulino |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] QJSON: Use OBJECT_CHECK |
Date: |
Tue, 5 May 2015 08:53:50 -0400 |
On Tue, 05 May 2015 14:43:19 +0200
Juan Quintela <address@hidden> wrote:
> Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 07:05:55PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> >> Am 25.04.2015 um 17:28 schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> >> > The QJSON code used casts to (QJSON*) directly, instead of OBJECT_CHECK.
> >> > There were even some functions using object_dynamic_cast() calls
> >> > followed by assert(), which is exactly what OBJECT_CHECK does (by
> >> > calling object_dynamic_cast_assert()).
> >>
> >> Suggest s/OBJECT_CHECK/OBJECT_CHECK()/g everywhere for clarity.
> >
> > I assume it can be fixed during commit by whoever is going to queue it.
> >
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
> >> > ---
> >> > qjson.c | 10 +++++-----
> >> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber <address@hidden>
> >>
> >> Wasn't aware QJSON is using QOM - assuming this will go through some
> >> QAPI/QMP tree.
> >
> > The only user of qjson.c right now is migration code. Should it go through
> > the migration tree?
>
>
> I will take it, but I trust your reviews-by O:-)
I've already applied this one to the QMP tree.
>
> >
> > Also, why do we have two JSON writers in QEMU? And why do they have
> > exactly the same name?
>
> Alex? I guess alex have this implementation when he did the code long
> ago?
>
> Later, Juan.
>