qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 10/16] hw/intc/arm_gic: Implement Non-secure


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 10/16] hw/intc/arm_gic: Implement Non-secure view of RPR
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 20:24:41 +0100

On 30 October 2014 at 22:12, Greg Bellows <address@hidden> wrote:
> From: Fabian Aggeler <address@hidden>
>
> For GICs with Security Extensions Non-secure reads have a restricted
> view on the current running priority.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Aggeler <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/intc/arm_gic.c      | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>  hw/intc/gic_internal.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gic.c b/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
> index 3761d12..9b021d7 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
> @@ -314,6 +314,21 @@ void gic_set_cpu_control(GICState *s, int cpu, uint32_t 
> value)
>      }
>  }
>
> +uint8_t gic_get_running_priority(GICState *s, int cpu)
> +{
> +    if (s->security_extn && ns_access()) {
> +        if (s->running_priority[cpu] & 0x80) {
> +            /* Running priority in upper half, return Non-secure view */
> +            return s->running_priority[cpu] << 1;
> +        } else {
> +            /* Running priority in lower half, RAZ */
> +            return 0;
> +        }
> +    } else {
> +        return s->running_priority[cpu];
> +    }
> +}
> +
>  void gic_complete_irq(GICState *s, int cpu, int irq)
>  {
>      int update = 0;
> @@ -849,7 +864,7 @@ static uint32_t gic_cpu_read(GICState *s, int cpu, int 
> offset)
>      case 0x0c: /* Acknowledge */
>          return gic_acknowledge_irq(s, cpu);
>      case 0x14: /* Running Priority */
> -        return s->running_priority[cpu];
> +        return gic_get_running_priority(s, cpu);
>      case 0x18: /* Highest Pending Interrupt */
>          return s->current_pending[cpu];
>      case 0x1c: /* Aliased Binary Point */
> diff --git a/hw/intc/gic_internal.h b/hw/intc/gic_internal.h
> index e360de6..821ce16 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/gic_internal.h
> +++ b/hw/intc/gic_internal.h
> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ void gic_init_irqs_and_distributor(GICState *s);
>  void gic_set_priority(GICState *s, int cpu, int irq, uint8_t val);
>  uint32_t gic_get_cpu_control(GICState *s, int cpu);
>  void gic_set_cpu_control(GICState *s, int cpu, uint32_t value);
> +uint8_t gic_get_running_priority(GICState *s, int cpu);

I think this patch should be combined with patch 14 (which
deals with the other half of the priority register changes.)

-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]