qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-m68k: add support for interrupt masking


From: Stefan Weil
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-m68k: add support for interrupt masking/unmasking
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 18:03:24 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.5.0

Am 28.03.2015 um 17:07 schrieb Waldemar Brodkorb:
Fixes following problem, when trying to boot linux:
qemu: hardware error: mcf_intc_write: Bad write offset 28

CPU #0:
D0 = 000000ff   A0 = 402ea5dc   F0 = 0000000000000000 (           0)
D1 = 00000004   A1 = 402ea5e0   F1 = 0000000000000000 (           0)
D2 = 00000040   A2 = 40040752   F2 = 0000000000000000 (           0)
D3 = 00000000   A3 = 40040a98   F3 = 0000000000000000 (           0)
D4 = 00000000   A4 = 400407b4   F4 = 0000000000000000 (           0)
D5 = 00000000   A5 = 00000000   F5 = 0000000000000000 (           0)
D6 = 00000000   A6 = 40195ff8   F6 = 0000000000000000 (           0)
D7 = 00000000   A7 = 40195fd0   F7 = 0000000000000000 (           0)
PC = 401b2058   SR = 2704 --Z-- FPRESULT =            0
Aborted

System started via:
qemu-system-m68k -nographic -nographic -M mcf5208evb -cpu m5208 -kernel kernel

Patch originally posted here:
http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2012-April/052585.html

Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <address@hidden>
Tested-by: Waldemar Brodkorb <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Waldemar Brodkorb <address@hidden>
---
v1 -> v2:
         - add {} to conform to Qemu Coding Style suggested by Stefan Weil
         - add short comments to case statements with return 0 suggested by 
Peter Maydell
         - ull as suffix to integer 1 suggested by Peter Maydell does not work 
for me
          as I get a kernel panic shortly after boot

Maybe that's an indicator that it only works with 1ULL. :-)

Did you add it at both locations (for set and clear of interrupt mask)?

If not: does it work if you fix this?

If yes: does it work if you only use 1ULL for SIMR?

You can debug the kernel panic by attaching a cross debugger to the running kernel.
If you have a kernel image with debug symbols, this is very comfortable.

---
  hw/m68k/mcf_intc.c |   19 +++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/m68k/mcf_intc.c b/hw/m68k/mcf_intc.c
index 621423c..dcd14b9 100644
--- a/hw/m68k/mcf_intc.c
+++ b/hw/m68k/mcf_intc.c
@@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ static uint64_t mcf_intc_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
          return (uint32_t)(s->ifr >> 32);
      case 0x14:
          return (uint32_t)s->ifr;
+    case 0x1c: /* SIMR */
+    case 0x1d: /* CIMR */
+       return 0;
      case 0xe0: /* SWIACK.  */
          return s->active_vector;
      case 0xe1: case 0xe2: case 0xe3: case 0xe4:
@@ -102,6 +105,22 @@ static void mcf_intc_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
      case 0x0c:
          s->imr = (s->imr & 0xffffffff00000000ull) | (uint32_t)val;
          break;
+    /* SIMR allows to easily mask interrupts */
+    case 0x1c:
+       if (val & 0x40) {
+               s->imr = ~0ull;

Maybe UINT64_MAX is better than ~0ull.

+       } else {
+               s->imr |= (1 << (val & 0x3f));

As Peter already said, 1ULL is needed if you want to allow shifts resulting in a 64 bit value.
It's also possible to use a type cast like this: (uint64_t)1.

+       }
+       break;
+    /* CIMR allows to easily unmask interrupts */
+    case 0x1d:
+       if (val & 0x40) {
+               s->imr = 0ull;

Here the ULL is redundant.

+       } else {
+               s->imr &= ~(1 << (val & 0x3f));

Here also 1ULL or a type cast is needed.

+       }
+       break;
      default:
          hw_error("mcf_intc_write: Bad write offset %d\n", offset);
          break;




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]