[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] GSoC Proposal: ARM Virtualization Extensions

From: Merten Sach
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] GSoC Proposal: ARM Virtualization Extensions
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 12:29:20 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0

On 20/03/15 18:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
>  * having a project plan that divides the work up into small
>    but coherent chunks that can be landed upstream incrementally
>    (to avoid the failure mode of "work all summer but don't
>    get it finished, and so don't have anything concrete
>    to show for it at the end")


what is the policy for incomplete specification implementations?
For example, I could imagine implementing mode switches and exception routing
without nested paging (though Sergey already implemented it). This would not be
sufficient to run KVM. However one could test it.

Best regards,

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]