qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 14/17] ahci: Migrate IDEStatus


From: Amit Shah
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 14/17] ahci: Migrate IDEStatus
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:13:02 +0530

On (Fri) 13 Mar 2015 [09:21:19], Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 13.03.2015 um 07:01 hat Amit Shah geschrieben:
> > On (Mon) 23 Feb 2015 [11:18:03], John Snow wrote:
> > > Amazingly, we weren't doing this before.
> > > 
> > > Make sure we migrate the IDEState structure that belongs to
> > > the AHCIDevice.IDEBus structure during migrations.
> > > 
> > > No version numbering changes because AHCI is not officially
> > > migratable (and we can all see with good reason why) so we
> > > do not impact any official builds by altering the stream and
> > > leaving it at version 1.
> > > 
> > > This fixes the rerror=stop/werror=stop test case where we wish
> > > to migrate a halted job. Previously, the error code would not
> > > migrate, so even if the job completed successfully, AHCI would
> > > report an error because it would still have the placeholder
> > > error code from initialization time.
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> > > Signed-off-by: John Snow <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > >  hw/ide/ahci.c     | 1 +
> > >  hw/ide/internal.h | 3 +++
> > >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/hw/ide/ahci.c b/hw/ide/ahci.c
> > > index bc6d5ce..3f4fc77 100644
> > > --- a/hw/ide/ahci.c
> > > +++ b/hw/ide/ahci.c
> > > @@ -1321,6 +1321,7 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_ahci_device 
> > > = {
> > >      .version_id = 1,
> > >      .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
> > >          VMSTATE_IDE_BUS(port, AHCIDevice),
> > > +        VMSTATE_IDE_DRIVE(port.ifs[0], AHCIDevice),
> > 
> > This adds a new field to the struct without bumping up the version
> > number.
> > 
> > Flagged by the static checker.
> 
> AHCI is still marked unmigratable, so it doesn't matter (and actually,
> I just see that the commit message above explicitly states this).

I missed that.  Thanks.


                Amit



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]