qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu crash in coroutine bdrv_co_do_rw


From: Christian Borntraeger
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu crash in coroutine bdrv_co_do_rw
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 08:54:52 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0

Am 09.03.2015 um 21:37 schrieb Christian Borntraeger:
> Am 06.03.2015 um 18:23 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:29:57AM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>> is this some know issue? Under heavy load with lots of dataplane devices I 
>>> sometimes get a segfault in the bdrc_co_do_rw routine:
>>>
>>> #0  bdrv_co_do_rw (opaque=0x0) at /home/cborntra/REPOS/qemu/block.c:4791
>>> 4791            if (!acb->is_write) {
>>> (gdb) bt
>>> #0  bdrv_co_do_rw (opaque=0x0) at /home/cborntra/REPOS/qemu/block.c:4791
>>> #1  0x00000000801aeb78 in coroutine_trampoline (i0=<optimized out>, 
>>> i1=-725099072) at /home/cborntra/REPOS/qemu/coroutine-ucontext.c:80
>>> #2  0x000003fffbe1cca2 in __makecontext_ret () from /lib64/libc.so.6
>>> Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
>>> (gdb) up
>>> #1  0x00000000801aeb78 in coroutine_trampoline (i0=<optimized out>, 
>>> i1=-725099072) at /home/cborntra/REPOS/qemu/coroutine-ucontext.c:80
>>> 80          co->entry(co->entry_arg);
>>> (gdb) print *co
>>> $1 = {entry = 0x801a3c28 <bdrv_co_do_rw>, entry_arg = 0x0, caller = 
>>> 0x3ffe2fff788, pool_next = {sle_next = 0x3ffd2287990}, co_queue_wakeup = 
>>> {tqh_first = 0x0, 
>>>     tqh_last = 0x3ffd4c7dde0}, co_queue_next = {tqe_next = 0x0, tqe_prev = 
>>> 0x0}}
>>>
>>> As you can see enty_arg is 0, causing the problem. Do you have any quick 
>>> idea before I start debugging?
>>
>> No, I haven't seen this bug before.  Are you running qemu.git/master?
>>
>> Have you tried disabling the coroutine pool (freelist)?
>>
>> Stefan
>>
> 
> I was able to increase the likelyhood of hitting this (more vCPUs, less 
> guests).
> 
> bisect thinks that this makes this shaky:
> 
> 4d68e86bb10159099da0798f74e7512955f15eec is the first bad commit
> commit 4d68e86bb10159099da0798f74e7512955f15eec
> Author: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> Date:   Tue Dec 2 12:05:48 2014 +0100
> 
>     coroutine: rewrite pool to avoid mutex
> 
> 
> Christian
> 

Yes, reverting these 3 makes the problem go away during an overnight run.


    Revert "coroutine: rewrite pool to avoid mutex"
    
    This reverts commit 4d68e86bb10159099da0798f74e7512955f15eec.

    Revert "coroutine: drop qemu_coroutine_adjust_pool_size"
    
    This reverts commit 66552b894bd68dd6539fb6d656ad2c21bdd6acbe.


    Revert "coroutine: try harder not to delete coroutines"
   
    This reverts commit 51a2219bdceed16e81c6e2e2f08aed39c579728f.


Christian




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]