|
From: | zhanghailiang |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vl: Adjust the place of processing '-mon' |
Date: | Fri, 6 Mar 2015 16:58:08 +0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 |
On 2015/3/5 1:02, Markus Armbruster wrote:
zhanghailiang <address@hidden> writes:From: Xiangyou Xie <address@hidden> If VM is configured with large size of hugepage, when startup, it will consume lots of time to zero the hugepage memory in the function 'os_mem_prealloc'. Libvirtd will wait 30 seconds for qemu to establish the monitor, If the timeout triggers, libvirtd will send TERM signal to kill qemu. To solve the problem, adjust the processing of '-mon' to the ahead of '-object'. Signed-off-by: Xiangyou Xie <address@hidden> Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <address@hidden> --- vl.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c index 86bdce0..d0c03fe 100644 --- a/vl.c +++ b/vl.c @@ -4000,6 +4000,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp) exit(0); } + if (qemu_opts_foreach(qemu_find_opts("mon"), mon_init_func, NULL, 1) != 0) { + exit(1); + } + if (qemu_opts_foreach(qemu_find_opts("object"), object_create, NULL, 0) != 0) { exit(1); @@ -4154,10 +4158,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp) parse_numa_opts(); - if (qemu_opts_foreach(qemu_find_opts("mon"), mon_init_func, NULL, 1) != 0) { - exit(1); - } - if (foreach_device_config(DEV_SERIAL, serial_parse) < 0) exit(1); if (foreach_device_config(DEV_PARALLEL, parallel_parse) < 0)Errors after monitor initialization look ugly when a monitor is on stdio: $ qemu -nodefaults -monitor stdio -vga xxx QEMU 2.2.50 monitor - type 'help' for more information (qemu) Unknown vga type: xxx $ This patch initializes monitors earlier, thus makes more errors look ugly. Do we care?
Hmm, i don't think it will make any difference, no matter monitor or stdio, it is all OK, it is just error reports, let people know what's wrong.
If not: should we initialize them even earlier? They depend on character devices, so what about right after loop calling chardev_init_func()?
This is reasonable, will fix it like that in v2, thanks.
Our startup is a big happy ad hoc mess. A more organizes program would
Yes, maybe some cleanup work should be done.
read and check configuration first (quick, can fail), then allocate resources (quick, can fail), then initialize (somewhat slow, failure unlikely). .
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |