[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/69] Block patches

From: Christian Borntraeger
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/69] Block patches
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 09:28:03 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0

Am 03.03.2015 um 18:33 schrieb Max Reitz:
> On 2015-03-03 at 12:29, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> Am 03.03.2015 um 15:52 schrieb Peter Maydell:
>>> On 28 February 2015 at 03:57, Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>> Ekaterina Tumanova (5):
>>>>>    block: add bdrv functions for geometry and blocksize
>>>>>    raw-posix: Factor block size detection out of raw_probe_alignment()
>>>>>    block: Add driver methods to probe blocksizes and geometry
>>>>>    block-backend: Add wrappers for blocksizes and geometry probing
>>>>>    BlockConf: Call backend functions to detect geometry and blocksizes
>>>> Max Reitz found an issue with this patch.
>>>> Peter: Please squash the following trivial fix into "BlockConf: Call
>>>> backend functions to detect geometry and blocksizes":
>>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-02/msg05512.html
>>> I can't squash fixes into pull requests -- I can only
>>> apply them, or not apply them. You need to respin.
>>>> I want to avoid spamming the list with another 60 patches.
>>> If it's a trivial change since last time around you can just
>>> send the cover letter to the list with a note in it that there
>>> have only been small changes.
>>> -- PMM
>> I think you could just apply this pull request and add the fixup as separate
>> patch.
>> After all it fixes a case were the command line is wrong, so should not
>> on the critical path - I guess.
> I agree. It's not nice to have a known break, but we're a bit behind on the 
> pull requests already... Also, the segfault is always caused by dereferencing 
> a null pointer, so there is no security issue.


unless Stefan/Kevin object:

can you pull the original pull request?


can you resend patch " scsi-hd: fix property unset case" with an additional 
as Markus suggested directly to Peter Maydell, cc 


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]