[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v16 1/2] sPAPR: Implement EEH RTAS calls
From: |
Gavin Shan |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v16 1/2] sPAPR: Implement EEH RTAS calls |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Feb 2015 16:12:37 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 11:58:25AM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 04:50:06PM +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 02:19:49PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
>> >On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 01:27:35PM +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> >> The emulation for EEH RTAS requests from guest isn't covered
>> >> by QEMU yet and the patch implements them.
>> >>
>> >> The patch defines constants used by EEH RTAS calls and adds
>> >> callback sPAPRPHBClass::eeh_handler, which is going to be used
>> >> this way:
>> >>
>> >> * RTAS calls are received in spapr_pci.c, sanity check is done
>> >> there.
>> >> * RTAS handlers handle what they can. If there is something it
>> >> cannot handle and sPAPRPHBClass::eeh_handler callback is defined,
>> >> it is called.
>> >> * sPAPRPHBClass::eeh_handler is only implemented for VFIO now. It
>> >> does ioctl() to the IOMMU container fd to complete the call. Error
>> >> codes from that ioctl() are transferred back to the guest.
>> >>
>> >> [aik: defined RTAS tokens for EEH RTAS calls]
>> >> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <address@hidden>
>> >> ---
>> >> hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c | 310
>> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h | 7 +
>> >> include/hw/ppc/spapr.h | 43 +++++-
>> >> 3 files changed, 358 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>> >> index 6deeb19..3fac5a9 100644
>> >> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>> >> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>> >> @@ -406,6 +406,297 @@ static void
>> >> rtas_ibm_query_interrupt_source_number(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>> >> rtas_st(rets, 2, 1);/* 0 == level; 1 == edge */
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> +static void rtas_ibm_set_eeh_option(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>> >> + sPAPREnvironment *spapr,
>> >> + uint32_t token, uint32_t nargs,
>> >> + target_ulong args, uint32_t nret,
>> >> + target_ulong rets)
>> >> +{
>> >> + sPAPRPHBState *sphb;
>> >> + sPAPRPHBClass *spc;
>> >> + uint32_t addr, option;
>> >> + uint64_t buid;
>> >> + int ret;
>> >> +
>> >> + if ((nargs != 4) || (nret != 1)) {
>> >> + goto param_error_exit;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + buid = ((uint64_t)rtas_ld(args, 1) << 32) | rtas_ld(args, 2);
>> >> + addr = rtas_ld(args, 0);
>> >> + option = rtas_ld(args, 3);
>> >> +
>> >> + sphb = find_phb(spapr, buid);
>> >> + if (!sphb) {
>> >> + goto param_error_exit;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + spc = SPAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_GET_CLASS(sphb);
>> >> + if (!spc->eeh_handler) {
>> >
>> >Should this case be RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR or RTAS_OUT_NOT_SUPPORTED?
>> >
>>
>> Those 2 macros have equal values. I'm refering to PAPR spec version 2.7
>> for all the code. RTAS call "ibm,set-eeh-option" doesn't support
>> RTAS_OUT_NOT_SUPPORTED as its return value. So RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR
>> is correct return value here:
>>
>> #define RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR -3
>> #define RTAS_OUT_NOT_SUPPORTED -3
>
>Ah, ok.
>
>> >> + goto param_error_exit;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + switch (option) {
>> >> + case RTAS_EEH_ENABLE:
>> >> + if (!find_dev(spapr, buid, addr)) {
>> >> + goto param_error_exit;
>> >> + }
>> >> + break;
>> >> + case RTAS_EEH_DISABLE:
>> >> + case RTAS_EEH_THAW_IO:
>> >> + case RTAS_EEH_THAW_DMA:
>> >> + break;
>> >> + default:
>> >> + goto param_error_exit;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + ret = spc->eeh_handler(sphb, RTAS_EEH_REQ_SET_OPTION, option);
>> >> + if (ret < 0) {
>> >> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR);
>> >
>> >It seems like it would make sense for the eeh_handler callback to
>> >return rtas error codes, so that if it makes sense it can signal
>> >errors other than RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR.
>> >
>>
>> It's hard for spc->eeh_handler() to return unified and clean RTAS_OUT_*
>> because some of the callers (RTAS call handlers) supports one specific
>> return value, but the left won't support. RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR is one of
>> the example.
>>
>> You also suggested to have multiple callbacks maintained (instead of
>> spc->eeh_handler()). In that way, the sPAPRPHBClass callbacks can
>> return RTAS_OUT_* precisely for varous cases. However, we have to
>> pay more cost to maintain multiple callbacks.
>
>See, I disagree there. A multiplexed callback, which is what you
>have now, effectively is multiple callbacks but with an ugly
>interface. Maintaining separate callbacks is generally no harder.
>
Ok. I'll make it to 4 callbacks as follows:
eeh_set_option();
eeh_get_state();
eeh_reset();
eeh_configure();
>> >> + return;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS);
>> >> + return;
>> >> +
>> >> +param_error_exit:
>> >> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR);
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static void rtas_ibm_get_config_addr_info2(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>> >> + sPAPREnvironment *spapr,
>> >> + uint32_t token, uint32_t
>> >> nargs,
>> >> + target_ulong args, uint32_t
>> >> nret,
>> >> + target_ulong rets)
>> >> +{
>> >> + sPAPRPHBState *sphb;
>> >> + sPAPRPHBClass *spc;
>> >> + PCIDevice *pdev;
>> >> + uint32_t addr, option;
>> >> + uint64_t buid;
>> >> +
>> >> + if ((nargs != 4) || (nret != 2)) {
>> >> + goto param_error_exit;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + buid = ((uint64_t)rtas_ld(args, 1) << 32) | rtas_ld(args, 2);
>> >> + sphb = find_phb(spapr, buid);
>> >> + if (!sphb) {
>> >> + goto param_error_exit;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + spc = SPAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_GET_CLASS(sphb);
>> >> + if (!spc->eeh_handler) {
>> >> + goto param_error_exit;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + addr = rtas_ld(args, 0);
>> >> + option = rtas_ld(args, 3);
>> >> + if (option != RTAS_GET_PE_ADDR && option != RTAS_GET_PE_MODE) {
>> >> + goto param_error_exit;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + pdev = find_dev(spapr, buid, addr);
>> >> + if (!pdev) {
>> >> + goto param_error_exit;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + /*
>> >> + * For now, we always have bus level PE whose address
>> >> + * has format "00BBSS00". The guest OS might regard
>> >> + * PE address 0 as invalid. We avoid that simply by
>> >> + * extending it with one.
>> >
>> >This comment is a bit confusing. Why not just say we have PE
>> >addresses of form "00BBSS01". Also you should say what the BB and
>> >SS mean in your template.
>> >
>>
>> Sure, I'll fix it.
>>
>> >> + */
>> >> + if (option == RTAS_GET_PE_ADDR) {
>> >
>> >I think this would be clearer as a switch statement, which folds in
>> >the other if statement above.
>> >
>>
>> Yeah, it can save couple of CPU cycles at least. I'll fix it.
>
>I don't really care about CPU cycles here, just code readability.
>
Sure, it improve code readability as well.
>> >> + rtas_st(rets, 1, (pci_bus_num(pdev->bus) << 16) + 1);
>> >> + } else {
>> >> + rtas_st(rets, 1, RTAS_PE_MODE_SHARED);
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS);
>> >> + return;
>> >> +
>> >> +param_error_exit:
>> >> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR);
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static void rtas_ibm_read_slot_reset_state2(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>> >> + sPAPREnvironment *spapr,
>> >> + uint32_t token, uint32_t
>> >> nargs,
>> >> + target_ulong args, uint32_t
>> >> nret,
>> >> + target_ulong rets)
>> >> +{
>> >> + sPAPRPHBState *sphb;
>> >> + sPAPRPHBClass *spc;
>> >> + uint64_t buid;
>> >> + int ret;
>> >> +
>> >> + if ((nargs != 3) || (nret != 4 && nret != 5)) {
>> >> + goto param_error_exit;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + buid = ((uint64_t)rtas_ld(args, 1) << 32) | rtas_ld(args, 2);
>> >> + sphb = find_phb(spapr, buid);
>> >> + if (!sphb) {
>> >> + goto param_error_exit;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + spc = SPAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_GET_CLASS(sphb);
>> >> + if (!spc->eeh_handler) {
>> >> + goto param_error_exit;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + ret = spc->eeh_handler(sphb, RTAS_EEH_REQ_GET_STATE, 0);
>> >> + if (ret < 0) {
>> >> + goto param_error_exit;
>> >
>> >So here, all errors from eeh_handler are turned into
>> >RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR, whereas above they were all turned into
>> >RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR.
>> >
>>
>> Yeah, RTAS call "ibm,read-slot-reset-state2" only supports following return
>> values. I even suspect if I had wrong PAPR spec at hand :(
>>
>> 0: Success
>> -3: Parameter Error
>
>Heh, ok.
>
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + rtas_st(rets, 1, ret);
>> >> + rtas_st(rets, 2, RTAS_EEH_SUPPORT);
>> >> + rtas_st(rets, 3, RTAS_EEH_PE_UNAVAIL_INFO);
>> >> + if (nret >= 5) {
>> >> + rtas_st(rets, 4, RTAS_EEH_PE_RECOVER_INFO);
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS);
>> >> + return;
>> >> +
>> >> +param_error_exit:
>> >> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR);
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static void rtas_ibm_set_slot_reset(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>> >> + sPAPREnvironment *spapr,
>> >> + uint32_t token, uint32_t nargs,
>> >> + target_ulong args, uint32_t nret,
>> >> + target_ulong rets)
>> >> +{
>> >> + sPAPRPHBState *sphb;
>> >> + sPAPRPHBClass *spc;
>> >> + uint32_t option;
>> >> + uint64_t buid;
>> >> + int ret;
>> >> +
>> >> + if ((nargs != 4) || (nret != 1)) {
>> >> + goto param_error_exit;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + buid = ((uint64_t)rtas_ld(args, 1) << 32) | rtas_ld(args, 2);
>> >> + option = rtas_ld(args, 3);
>> >> + sphb = find_phb(spapr, buid);
>> >> + if (!sphb) {
>> >> + goto param_error_exit;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + spc = SPAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_GET_CLASS(sphb);
>> >> + if (!spc->eeh_handler) {
>> >> + goto param_error_exit;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + switch (option) {
>> >> + case RTAS_SLOT_RESET_DEACTIVATE:
>> >> + case RTAS_SLOT_RESET_HOT:
>> >> + case RTAS_SLOT_RESET_FUNDAMENTAL:
>> >> + break;
>> >> + default:
>> >> + goto param_error_exit;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + ret = spc->eeh_handler(sphb, RTAS_EEH_REQ_RESET, option);
>> >> + if (ret < 0) {
>> >> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR);
>> >> + return;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS);
>> >> + return;
>> >> +
>> >> +param_error_exit:
>> >> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR);
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static void rtas_ibm_configure_pe(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>> >> + sPAPREnvironment *spapr,
>> >> + uint32_t token, uint32_t nargs,
>> >> + target_ulong args, uint32_t nret,
>> >> + target_ulong rets)
>> >> +{
>> >> + sPAPRPHBState *sphb;
>> >> + sPAPRPHBClass *spc;
>> >> + uint64_t buid;
>> >> + int ret;
>> >> +
>> >> + if ((nargs != 3) || (nret != 1)) {
>> >> + goto param_error_exit;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + buid = ((uint64_t)rtas_ld(args, 1) << 32) | rtas_ld(args, 2);
>> >> + sphb = find_phb(spapr, buid);
>> >> + if (!sphb) {
>> >> + goto param_error_exit;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + spc = SPAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_GET_CLASS(sphb);
>> >> + if (!spc->eeh_handler) {
>> >> + goto param_error_exit;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + ret = spc->eeh_handler(sphb, RTAS_EEH_REQ_CONFIGURE, 0);
>> >> + if (ret < 0) {
>> >> + goto param_error_exit;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS);
>> >> + return;
>> >> +
>> >> +param_error_exit:
>> >> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR);
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +/* To support it later */
>> >> +static void rtas_ibm_slot_error_detail(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>> >> + sPAPREnvironment *spapr,
>> >> + uint32_t token, uint32_t nargs,
>> >> + target_ulong args, uint32_t nret,
>> >> + target_ulong rets)
>> >> +{
>> >> + sPAPRPHBState *sphb;
>> >> + sPAPRPHBClass *spc;
>> >> + int option;
>> >> + uint64_t buid;
>> >> +
>> >> + if ((nargs != 8) || (nret != 1)) {
>> >> + goto no_error_log;
>> >
>> >Surely this should be RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR, not RTAS_OUT_NO_ERRORS_FOUND.
>> >
>>
>> RTAS call "ibm,slot-error-detail" supports following return values:
>>
>> 1: No Error Log Returned
>> 0: Success
>> -1: Hardware Error (cannot create log)
>
>So, in this particular case, I think you should return
>RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR despite what PAPR says. When the number of
>arguments isn't even right, you're not really calling this RTAS
>function, so what it says about return values doens't really make any
>sense.
>
Ok. Will return RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR for this particular case.
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + buid = ((uint64_t)rtas_ld(args, 1) << 32) | rtas_ld(args, 2);
>> >> + sphb = find_phb(spapr, buid);
>> >> + if (!sphb) {
>> >> + goto no_error_log;
>> >
>> >.. and this one..
>> >
>>
>> Please refer to above explaination.
>
>In this case and the rest though, what PAPR says should be applied,
>even if it is a bit stupid.
>
Ok. Will return "1: No Error Log Returned" for all left cases.
Thanks,
Gavin
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + spc = SPAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_GET_CLASS(sphb);
>> >> + if (!spc->eeh_handler) {
>> >> + goto no_error_log;
>> >
>> >.. possibly not this one ..
>> >
>>
>> As above.
>>
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + option = rtas_ld(args, 7);
>> >> + switch (option) {
>> >> + case RTAS_SLOT_TEMP_ERR_LOG:
>> >> + case RTAS_SLOT_PERM_ERR_LOG:
>> >> + break;
>> >> + default:
>> >> + goto no_error_log;
>> >
>> >.. but again this one ..
>> >
>>
>> As above.
>>
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + /* We don't get error log yet */
>> >> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_NO_ERRORS_FOUND);
>> >> + return;
>> >> +
>> >> +no_error_log:
>> >> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_NO_ERRORS_FOUND);
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> static int pci_spapr_swizzle(int slot, int pin)
>> >> {
>> >> return (slot + pin) % PCI_NUM_PINS;
>> >> @@ -964,6 +1255,25 @@ void spapr_pci_rtas_init(void)
>> >> spapr_rtas_register(RTAS_IBM_CHANGE_MSI, "ibm,change-msi",
>> >> rtas_ibm_change_msi);
>> >> }
>> >> +
>> >> + spapr_rtas_register(RTAS_IBM_SET_EEH_OPTION,
>> >> + "ibm,set-eeh-option",
>> >> + rtas_ibm_set_eeh_option);
>> >> + spapr_rtas_register(RTAS_IBM_GET_CONFIG_ADDR_INFO2,
>> >> + "ibm,get-config-addr-info2",
>> >> + rtas_ibm_get_config_addr_info2);
>> >> + spapr_rtas_register(RTAS_IBM_READ_SLOT_RESET_STATE2,
>> >> + "ibm,read-slot-reset-state2",
>> >> + rtas_ibm_read_slot_reset_state2);
>> >> + spapr_rtas_register(RTAS_IBM_SET_SLOT_RESET,
>> >> + "ibm,set-slot-reset",
>> >> + rtas_ibm_set_slot_reset);
>> >> + spapr_rtas_register(RTAS_IBM_CONFIGURE_PE,
>> >> + "ibm,configure-pe",
>> >> + rtas_ibm_configure_pe);
>> >> + spapr_rtas_register(RTAS_IBM_SLOT_ERROR_DETAIL,
>> >> + "ibm,slot-error-detail",
>> >> + rtas_ibm_slot_error_detail);
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> static void spapr_pci_register_types(void)
>> >> diff --git a/include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h b/include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h
>> >> index 876ecf0..bfde083 100644
>> >> --- a/include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h
>> >> +++ b/include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h
>> >> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ struct sPAPRPHBClass {
>> >> PCIHostBridgeClass parent_class;
>> >>
>> >> void (*finish_realize)(sPAPRPHBState *sphb, Error **errp);
>> >> + int (*eeh_handler)(sPAPRPHBState *sphb, int req, int opt);
>> >> };
>> >>
>> >> typedef struct spapr_pci_msi {
>> >> @@ -109,6 +110,12 @@ struct sPAPRPHBVFIOState {
>> >>
>> >> #define SPAPR_PCI_MEM_WIN_BUS_OFFSET 0x80000000ULL
>> >>
>> >> +/* EEH related requests */
>> >> +#define RTAS_EEH_REQ_SET_OPTION 0
>> >> +#define RTAS_EEH_REQ_GET_STATE 1
>> >> +#define RTAS_EEH_REQ_RESET 2
>> >> +#define RTAS_EEH_REQ_CONFIGURE 3
>> >
>> >AFAICT these are internal constants only, not defined by PAPR, used to
>> >multiplex the eeh_handler callback.
>> >
>> >We have to cope with the multiplexed calls defined by PAPR, but we
>> >should avoid adding multiplexers of our own. I think these functions
>> >should each be separate callbacks in the PHB class.
>> >
>>
>> Ok. I'm going to split them into following callbacks and all of them will
>> have RTAS_OUT_* as their return values:
>>
>> eeh_set_option();
>> eeh_get_state();
>> eeh_reset();
>> eeh_configure();
>>
>> David, thank you for your time reviewing this.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gavin
>>
>> >> static inline qemu_irq spapr_phb_lsi_qirq(struct sPAPRPHBState *phb, int
>> >> pin)
>> >> {
>> >> return xics_get_qirq(spapr->icp, phb->lsi_table[pin].irq);
>> >> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
>> >> index 642cdc3..1cf5e89 100644
>> >> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
>> >> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
>> >> @@ -338,6 +338,39 @@ target_ulong spapr_hypercall(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>> >> target_ulong opcode,
>> >> int spapr_allocate_irq(int hint, bool lsi);
>> >> int spapr_allocate_irq_block(int num, bool lsi, bool msi);
>> >>
>> >> +/* ibm,set-eeh-option */
>> >> +#define RTAS_EEH_DISABLE 0
>> >> +#define RTAS_EEH_ENABLE 1
>> >> +#define RTAS_EEH_THAW_IO 2
>> >> +#define RTAS_EEH_THAW_DMA 3
>> >> +
>> >> +/* ibm,get-config-addr-info2 */
>> >> +#define RTAS_GET_PE_ADDR 0
>> >> +#define RTAS_GET_PE_MODE 1
>> >> +#define RTAS_PE_MODE_NONE 0
>> >> +#define RTAS_PE_MODE_NOT_SHARED 1
>> >> +#define RTAS_PE_MODE_SHARED 2
>> >> +
>> >> +/* ibm,read-slot-reset-state2 */
>> >> +#define RTAS_EEH_PE_STATE_NORMAL 0
>> >> +#define RTAS_EEH_PE_STATE_RESET 1
>> >> +#define RTAS_EEH_PE_STATE_STOPPED_IO_DMA 2
>> >> +#define RTAS_EEH_PE_STATE_STOPPED_DMA 4
>> >> +#define RTAS_EEH_PE_STATE_UNAVAIL 5
>> >> +#define RTAS_EEH_NOT_SUPPORT 0
>> >> +#define RTAS_EEH_SUPPORT 1
>> >> +#define RTAS_EEH_PE_UNAVAIL_INFO 1000
>> >> +#define RTAS_EEH_PE_RECOVER_INFO 0
>> >> +
>> >> +/* ibm,set-slot-reset */
>> >> +#define RTAS_SLOT_RESET_DEACTIVATE 0
>> >> +#define RTAS_SLOT_RESET_HOT 1
>> >> +#define RTAS_SLOT_RESET_FUNDAMENTAL 3
>> >> +
>> >> +/* ibm,slot-error-detail */
>> >> +#define RTAS_SLOT_TEMP_ERR_LOG 1
>> >> +#define RTAS_SLOT_PERM_ERR_LOG 2
>> >> +
>> >> /* RTAS return codes */
>> >> #define RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS 0
>> >> #define RTAS_OUT_NO_ERRORS_FOUND 1
>> >> @@ -382,8 +415,14 @@ int spapr_allocate_irq_block(int num, bool lsi, bool
>> >> msi);
>> >> #define RTAS_GET_SENSOR_STATE (RTAS_TOKEN_BASE + 0x1D)
>> >> #define RTAS_IBM_CONFIGURE_CONNECTOR (RTAS_TOKEN_BASE + 0x1E)
>> >> #define RTAS_IBM_OS_TERM (RTAS_TOKEN_BASE + 0x1F)
>> >> -
>> >> -#define RTAS_TOKEN_MAX (RTAS_TOKEN_BASE + 0x20)
>> >> +#define RTAS_IBM_SET_EEH_OPTION (RTAS_TOKEN_BASE + 0x20)
>> >> +#define RTAS_IBM_GET_CONFIG_ADDR_INFO2 (RTAS_TOKEN_BASE + 0x21)
>> >> +#define RTAS_IBM_READ_SLOT_RESET_STATE2 (RTAS_TOKEN_BASE + 0x22)
>> >> +#define RTAS_IBM_SET_SLOT_RESET (RTAS_TOKEN_BASE + 0x23)
>> >> +#define RTAS_IBM_CONFIGURE_PE (RTAS_TOKEN_BASE + 0x24)
>> >> +#define RTAS_IBM_SLOT_ERROR_DETAIL (RTAS_TOKEN_BASE + 0x25)
>> >> +
>> >> +#define RTAS_TOKEN_MAX (RTAS_TOKEN_BASE + 0x26)
>> >>
>> >> /* RTAS ibm,get-system-parameter token values */
>> >> #define RTAS_SYSPARM_SPLPAR_CHARACTERISTICS 20
>> >
>>
>>
>
>--
>David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
>david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
> | _way_ _around_!
>http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v16 2/2] sPAPR: Implement sPAPRPHBClass::eeh_handler, Gavin Shan, 2015/02/03