Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: Universal encryption on QEMU I/O channels

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 04/02/2015 21:41, Peter Maydell wrote:
> That suggests to me that we could reasonably advance to
> 2.22 or 2.24 if it seemed beneficial, but not beyond that.
> Is there anything particularly worthwhile that would get us?

2.22 is the first version to have GIO.

2.28 would give us TLS support in GIO, but Daniel said it's buggy.

2.32 has new-style synchronization primitives, for which we currently
have some hideous compatibility wrappers.

It looks like there's no particular reason yet to bump our requirement.

Paolo