[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] question about live migration with storage
From: |
Zhang Haoyu |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] question about live migration with storage |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:41:05 +0800 |
On 2015-01-13 17:45:45, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 13/01/2015 03:03, Zhang Haoyu wrote:
> > >I want to live migrate a vm with storage, with regard to the migration of
> > >storage,
> > >should I use drive_mirror or traditional mechanism implemented in
> > >block-migration.c ?
> >
> > Because I don't use libvirtd to manage vm,
> > if I want to use drive_mirror to perform live migration with storage,
> > how to organize the flow via script?
>
> The same as libvirt does.
>
Hi, Paolo,
what's advantages of drive_mirror over traditional mechanism implemented in
block-migration.c ?
Why libvirt use drive_mirror instead of traditional iterative mechanism as the
default way
of live migration with non-shared storage?
Thanks,
Zhang Haoyu
> Paolo
- [Qemu-devel] question about live migration with storage, Zhang Haoyu, 2015/01/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] question about live migration with storage, Zhang Haoyu, 2015/01/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] question about live migration with storage, Paolo Bonzini, 2015/01/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] question about live migration with storage,
Zhang Haoyu <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] question about live migration with storage, Paolo Bonzini, 2015/01/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] question about live migration with storage, Zhang Haoyu, 2015/01/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] question about live migration with storage, Paolo Bonzini, 2015/01/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] question about live migration with storage, Zhang Haoyu, 2015/01/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] question about live migration with storage, Paolo Bonzini, 2015/01/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] question about live migration with storage, Zhang Haoyu, 2015/01/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] question about live migration with storage, Paolo Bonzini, 2015/01/15