qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Geometry and blocksize support for backi


From: Ekaterina Tumanova
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Geometry and blocksize support for backing devices
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:15:50 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0

On 11/28/2014 01:35 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:16:48PM +0300, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote:
On 11/25/2014 04:01 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:17:50AM +0100, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote:
3. Why does s390 need to customize hd_geometry_guess()?

Since hd_geometry_guess contains semantics of x86-specific LBA translation,
we have to modify it not to get in the way of z
architecture

If the behavior is x86-specific, it should be made x86-specific.  z,
ppc, sparc, arm, etc should share the non-x86-specific code path.  It's
weird to single out z here, this seems like the wrong way around.

Is the x86-specific behavior a problem in practice?  No one seemed to
mind for the other targets.


on s390 arch this adds support for FCP attached SCSI disks that do not
yet have a partition table. Without this patch, fdisk -l on the host
would return different results then fdisk -l in the guest.

If you guys don't like the way patch goes, I can exclude it from patch
series and we can discuss it later.

But I thought that since it's related to the hard drive geometry,
and since we change hd_geometry_guess in this patchset anyway, why not
get rid of this problem as well.

Kate.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]