[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] vl: fix max_cpus check
From: |
Eduardo Habkost |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] vl: fix max_cpus check |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 14:58:17 -0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 05:04:38PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> We should confirm max_cpus, which is >= smp_cpus, is
> <= the machine's true max_cpus, not just smp_cpus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <address@hidden>
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
I was sure I had fixed this before. But it looks like my patches were silently
ignored, and I forgot to ping about them.
See:
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 19:18:42 -0300
From: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vl.c: Check -smp option ranges before setting
int globals
and:
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 16:18:42 -0300
From: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
Message-Id: <address@hidden>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 RESEND] vl.c: Unify MAX_CPUMASK_BITS and
machine->max_cpus checks
> ---
> vl.c | 6 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c
> index f4a6e5e05bce2..9d9855092ab4a 100644
> --- a/vl.c
> +++ b/vl.c
> @@ -3903,9 +3903,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
> smp_parse(qemu_opts_find(qemu_find_opts("smp-opts"), NULL));
>
> machine_class->max_cpus = machine_class->max_cpus ?: 1; /* Default to UP
> */
> - if (smp_cpus > machine_class->max_cpus) {
> + if (max_cpus > machine_class->max_cpus) {
> fprintf(stderr, "Number of SMP cpus requested (%d), exceeds max cpus
> "
> - "supported by machine `%s' (%d)\n", smp_cpus,
> + "supported by machine `%s' (%d)\n", max_cpus,
> machine_class->name, machine_class->max_cpus);
> exit(1);
> }
> --
> 1.9.3
>
--
Eduardo
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] vl: warn on topology <-> maxcpus mismatch, Andrew Jones, 2014/11/07
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] vl: smp_parse sanity checks, Paolo Bonzini, 2014/11/11