qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c: Avoid functions not in glib 2.1


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c: Avoid functions not in glib 2.12 (g_hash_table_iter_*)
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:41:07 +0100

The g_hash_table_iter_* functions for iterating through a hash table
are not present in glib 2.12, which is our current minimum requirement.
Rewrite the code to use g_hash_table_foreach() instead.

Cc: address@hidden
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
---
I have tested that this builds with a glib 2.12, and also that it
passes 'make check', but no further testing beyond that. Somebody
with an spapr migration test should check it doesn't break things...

The observant will note that since this is fixing breakage
introduced in commit 9a321e92343 (merged in late June) we
obviously released 2.1 in a "doesn't build all targets on
glib 2.12" state, and nobody actually complained... So there's
maybe scope for debate about moving the minimum version up,
but I think for 2.2 we should stick with the current definition.

The cc:stable is in the interests of fixing that build breakage
in 2.1.x.

 hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
index ad0da7f..21b95b3 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
@@ -704,28 +704,34 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr_pci_msi = {
     },
 };
 
+static void spapr_pci_fill_msi_devs(gpointer key, gpointer value,
+                                    gpointer opaque)
+{
+    sPAPRPHBState *sphb = opaque;
+
+    sphb->msi_devs[sphb->msi_devs_num].key = *(uint32_t *)key;
+    sphb->msi_devs[sphb->msi_devs_num].value = *(spapr_pci_msi *)value;
+    sphb->msi_devs_num++;
+}
+
 static void spapr_pci_pre_save(void *opaque)
 {
     sPAPRPHBState *sphb = opaque;
-    GHashTableIter iter;
-    gpointer key, value;
-    int i;
+    int msi_devs_num;
 
     if (sphb->msi_devs) {
         g_free(sphb->msi_devs);
         sphb->msi_devs = NULL;
     }
-    sphb->msi_devs_num = g_hash_table_size(sphb->msi);
-    if (!sphb->msi_devs_num) {
+    sphb->msi_devs_num = 0;
+    msi_devs_num = g_hash_table_size(sphb->msi);
+    if (!msi_devs_num) {
         return;
     }
-    sphb->msi_devs = g_malloc(sphb->msi_devs_num * sizeof(spapr_pci_msi_mig));
+    sphb->msi_devs = g_malloc(msi_devs_num * sizeof(spapr_pci_msi_mig));
 
-    g_hash_table_iter_init(&iter, sphb->msi);
-    for (i = 0; g_hash_table_iter_next(&iter, &key, &value); ++i) {
-        sphb->msi_devs[i].key = *(uint32_t *) key;
-        sphb->msi_devs[i].value = *(spapr_pci_msi *) value;
-    }
+    g_hash_table_foreach(sphb->msi, spapr_pci_fill_msi_devs, sphb);
+    assert(sphb->msi_devs_num == msi_devs_num);
 }
 
 static int spapr_pci_post_load(void *opaque, int version_id)
-- 
1.9.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]