[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/14] GPIO/IRQ QOMification: Phase 2 - Getti
From: |
Alexander Graf |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/14] GPIO/IRQ QOMification: Phase 2 - Getting rid of SYSBUS IRQs |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Sep 2014 23:49:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 |
On 28.08.14 14:23, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 28.08.14 13:59, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 15.08.14 07:29, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> So phase one was the QOMification of qemu_irq. This is the next step.
>>> We start to setup GPIOs as proper QOM objects. Inputs are child objects
>>> of their device. Outputs are settable Links and connection is made
>>> via proper setting of a QOM link.
>>>
>>> We then cleanup Sysbus to simply re-use device level GPIOs and get rid
>>> of it's special IRQ handling code.
>>>
>>> Depends of my pending QOM array property stuff (the "[*]" series):
>>>
>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-07/msg04116.html
>>>
>>> Changed since v1:
>>> Addressed Alex review
>>> Dropped IRQ g_new0 changes
>>
>> With this patch set applied, the e500 machine fails to start:
>>
>> $ ./ppc-softmmu/qemu-system-ppc -M ppce500 -nographic
>> qemu-system-ppc: attempt to add duplicate property 'sysbus-irq[*]' to
>> object (type 'openpic')
>> Aborted
>
> Andreas pointed me to his qom-next branch where patches were that
> apparently are a prerequisite (doh, I should've read the cover letter).
>
> Sorry for the fuss, it works like a charm ;).
Can I expect this to land upstream anytime soon? :)
Alex
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/14] GPIO/IRQ QOMification: Phase 2 - Getting rid of SYSBUS IRQs,
Alexander Graf <=