[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Revert "virtio_rng: replace custom backend API
From: |
Amos Kong |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Revert "virtio_rng: replace custom backend API with UserCreatable.complete() callback" |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:07:17 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 03:47:20PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 12:23:52AM +0800, Amos Kong wrote:
> > This reverts commit 57d3e1b3f52d07d215ed96df946ee01f8d9f9526.
> >
> > The commit introduced a regression bug, the initialization order of
> > virtio-rng
> > backend was changed.
> >
> > # x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -monitor stdio -vnc :0 \
> > -chardev socket,host=localhost,port=1024,id=chr0 \
> > -object rng-egd,chardev=chr0,id=rng0
Paolo posted a new patch [1] to fix this bug, above commandline works.
> > qemu-system-x86_64: -object rng-egd,chardev=chr0,id=rng0: Device 'chr0'
> > not found
> >
> > Chardev 'chr0' isn't initialized when we try to open rng backend,
>
> More detail:
> The problem is that vl.c:main() calls object_create() on -object before
> -chardev options are processed. Moving the object_create() call after
> chardev is arbitrary and does not work if a chardev depends on an
> -object.
Stefan, can you give an example of the complex relying? So Paolo's patch can't
solve this problem?
> It would have been nice to process command-line options in left-to-right
> order instead of grouping them by option type. I doubt we can change
> this now since it would break the command-line.
>
> > Conflicts:
> > hw/virtio/virtio-rng.c
>
> This shouldn't be here.
>
> I agree with reverting commit 57d3e1b3f52d07d215ed96df946ee01f8d9f9526.
--
Amos.
pgpjKk6zCfJwq.pgp
Description: PGP signature