qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3 v2] bsd-user: Revert part of update to rules


From: Sean Bruno
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3 v2] bsd-user: Revert part of update to rules.mk
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 07:20:54 -0700

On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 16:15 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 16/06/2014 15:58, Sean Bruno ha scritto:
> > On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 06:55 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> >>>> Sean, could you show the configure command line?
> >>>
> >>> Also please attach the "make V=1" output and config-host.mak file.
> >>>
> >>> Paolo
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> I'm using:
> >>
> >>  ./configure --static --target-list="i386-bsd-user sparc-bsd-user
> >> sparc64-bsd-user x86_64-bsd-user"
> >>
> >> Log:
> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/qemu_build_fail.txt
> >>
> >> sean
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Also, configure output
> >
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/qemu_user_configure.txt
> 
> So this is happening because the $(sort) removes the ordering between 
> libraries and breaks static linking.  Your patch likely does nothing 
> except adding more copies of the libraries, which lets the linker work.
> 
> The executable that breaks is qemu-nbd, which I suspect you couldn't 
> care less about.
> 
> The bug remains, and ought to be fixed, probably like this:
> 
> diff --git a/rules.mak b/rules.mak
> index dde8e00..50b305e 100644
> --- a/rules.mak
> +++ b/rules.mak
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ QEMU_DGFLAGS += -MMD -MP -MT $@ -MF $(*D)/$(*F).d
>   # Same as -I$(SRC_PATH) -I., but for the nested source/object directories
>   QEMU_INCLUDES += -I$(<D) -I$(@D)
> 
> -extract-libs = $(strip $(sort $(foreach o,$1,$($o-libs))))
> +extract-libs = $(foreach o,$1,$($o-libs))
>   expand-objs = $(strip $(sort $(filter %.o,$1)) \
>                     $(foreach o,$(filter %.mo,$1),$($o-objs)) \
>                     $(filter-out %.o %.mo,$1))
> 
> but the other question is: do we care about static linking of anything 
> except the user-mode emulators?  Should --static automatically imply 
> --disable-tools --disable-system?
> 
> Paolo


Seems like this works for me on FreeBSD with my test case.  

sean




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]