Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] dataplane: IOThreads and writing dataplane-capable code

[Stefan Hajnoczi]

On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 07:58:11PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Stefan Hajnoczi (address@hidden) wrote:
> > On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
> > <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > * Stefan Hajnoczi (address@hidden) wrote:
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > >> How to synchronize with an IOThread
> > >> -----------------------------------
> > >> AioContext is not thread-safe so some rules must be followed when using 
> > >> file
> > >> descriptors, event notifiers, timers, or BHs across threads:
> > >>
> > >> 1. AioContext functions can be called safely from file descriptor, event
> > >> notifier, timer, or BH callbacks invoked by the AioContext.  No locking 
> > >> is
> > >> necessary.
> > >>
> > >> 2. Other threads wishing to access the AioContext must use
> > >> aio_context_acquire()/aio_context_release() for mutual exclusion.  Once 
> > >> the
> > >> context is acquired no other thread can access it or run event loop 
> > >> iterations
> > >> in this AioContext.
> > >>
> > >> aio_context_acquire()/aio_context_release() calls may be nested.  This
> > >> means you can call them if you're not sure whether #1 applies.
> > >>
> > >> Side note: the best way to schedule a function call across threads is to 
> > >> create
> > >> a BH in the target AioContext beforehand and then call 
> > >> qemu_bh_schedule().  No
> > >> acquire/release or locking is needed for the qemu_bh_schedule() call.  
> > >> But be
> > >> sure to acquire the AioContext for aio_bh_new() if necessary.
> > >
> > > How do these IOThreads pause during migration?
> > > Are they paused by the 'qemu_mutex_lock_iothread' that the migration 
> > > thread calls?
> > 
> > Currently the only IOThread user is virtio-blk data-plane.  It has a
> > VM state change listener registered that will stop using the IOThread
> > during migration.
> > 
> > In the future we'll have to do more than that:
> > It is possible to suspend all IOThreads simply by looping over
> > IOThread objects and calling aio_context_acquire() on their
> > AioContext.  You can release the AioContexts when you are done.  This
> > would be suitable for a "stop the world" operation for migration
> > hand-over.
> 
> That worries me for two reasons:
>    1) I'm assuming there is some subtlety so that it doesn't deadlock when
>      another thread is trying to get a couple of contexts.

Only the main loop acquires contexts, that's why there is no lock
ordering problem.

>    2) The migration code that has to pause everything is reasonably time
>       critical (OK not super critical - but it worries if it gains more than 
> a few
>       ms).   Doing something to each thread in series where that thread might
>       have to finish up a transaction sounds like it could add together to be 
> quite
>       large.

It's no different from today where we need to bdrv_drain_all();
bdrv_flush_all().  That's a synchronous operation that can take a while.

> > For smaller one-off operations like block-migration.c it may also make
> > sense to acquire/release the AioContext.  But that's not necessary
> > today since dataplane is disabled during migration.
> 
> I guess it's probably right to hide this behind some interface on the Aio 
> stuff
> that migration can call and it can worry about speed, and locking order etc.
> 
> I also would we end up wanting some IOThreads to continue - e.g. could we be 
> using
> them for transport of the migration stream or are they strictly for the guests
> use?

IOThreads are just threads running AioContext event loops.  They are
generic and could be used for stuff I/O intensive stuff like migration
or the VNC server.

Stefan