qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] arm: Clean up fragile use of error_is_set()


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] arm: Clean up fragile use of error_is_set() in realize() methods
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 09:18:28 +0100

On 25 April 2014 11:44, Markus Armbruster <address@hidden> wrote:
> Using error_is_set(ERRP) to find out whether a function failed is
> either wrong, fragile, or unnecessarily opaque.  It's wrong when ERRP
> may be null, because errors go undetected when it is.  It's fragile
> when proving ERRP non-null involves a non-local argument.  Else, it's
> unnecessarily opaque (see commit 84d18f0).
>
> I guess the error_is_set(errp) in the DeviceClass realize() methods
> are merely fragile right now, because I can't find a call chain that
> passes a null errp argument.
>
> Make the code more robust and more obviously correct: receive the
> error in a local variable, then propagate it through the parameter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>

Acked-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]