Re: [Qemu-devel] Who signed gemu-1.7.1.tar.bz2?

[Markus Armbruster]

Anthony Liguori <address@hidden> writes:

> On 04/22/14 07:35, Michael Roth wrote:
>> Quoting Stefan Hajnoczi (2014-04-22 08:31:08)
>>> On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 05:40:23PM -0700, Alex Davis wrote:
>>>> and where is their gpg key?
>>> 
>>> Michael Roth <address@hidden> is doing releases:
>>> 
>>> http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x3353C9CEF108B584
>>>
>>>
>>> 
> $ gpg --verify qemu-2.0.0.tar.bz2.sig
>>> gpg: Signature made Thu 17 Apr 2014 03:49:55 PM CEST using RSA
>>> key ID F108B584 gpg: Good signature from "Michael Roth
>>> <address@hidden>" gpg:                 aka "Michael Roth
>>> <address@hidden>" gpg:                 aka "Michael Roth
>>> <address@hidden>"
>> 
>> Missed the context, but if this is specifically about 1.7.1:
>> 
>> 1.7.1 was prior to me handling the release tarballs, Anthony
>> actually did the signing and uploading for that one. I'm a bit
>> confused though, as the key ID on that tarball is:
>> 
>> address@hidden:~/Downloads$ gpg --verify qemu-1.7.1.tar.bz2.sig gpg:
>> Signature made Tue 25 Mar 2014 09:03:24 AM CDT using RSA key ID
>> ADF0D2D9 gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
>> 
>> I can't seem to locate ADF0D2D9 though:
>> 
>> http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=0xADF0D2D9&op=vindex
>> 
>> Anthony's normal key (for 1.6.0 and 1.7.0 at least) was 7C18C076:
>> 
>> http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=0x7C18C076&op=vindex
>> 
>> I think maybe Anthony might've signed it with a separate local
>> key?
>
> Yeah, I accidentally signed it with the wrong key.  Replacing the
> signature doesn't seem like the right thing to do since release
> artifacts should never change.

You could still publish the key, with some suitable signatures.