Re: [Qemu-devel] Should we have a 2.0-rc3 ?

[Paolo Bonzini]

Il 14/04/2014 09:11, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
> On 11 April 2014 18:37, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Status update:
>> Applied:
>>  * ACPI fixes (both sets)
>>  * block queue
>>  * SDL2 relative mode fixes
>>  * fix for virtio-net CVE
>>  * fix for qom-list crash
>>  * my patch to stack-protector check
>> Patches on list but need review/ack and/or not sure whether to apply:
>>  * kvm_physical_sync_dirty_bitmap bug
> 
> I propose to apply the "revert" patch MJT posted.
> 
>>  * my fix to my stack-protector check patch (oops)
> 
> Applied.
> 
>>  * vmxnet3 patches
> 
> Applied.
> 
>> Raised as issues but no patches:
>>  * PCI bus naming
> 
> Nak from Alex, will not attempt to change for 2.0.
> 
>>  * win64 virtio-scsi regression
> 
> In the absence of any patches here I think we should deem
> win64 virtio-scsi sufficiently minor that it will get
> fixed in 2.0.1.

The patch is at
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/264111/raw
if you want to apply it.

Paolo

> Other:
>  * applied patch for a buffer overrun fix in IDE
>  * currently processing MST's ACPI pull
> 
> Summary: I'm going to apply MST's ACPI pull and the revert
> patch for the sync_dirty_bitmap issue, and then tag rc3
> today.
> 
> thanks
> -- PMM
> 
>