[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] kvm_physical_sync_dirty_bitmap: ignore ENOE
From: |
Serge Hallyn |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] kvm_physical_sync_dirty_bitmap: ignore ENOENT from kvm_vm_ioctl |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:47:09 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Quoting Michael Tokarev (address@hidden):
> 09.04.2014 07:21, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > ENOENT (iiuc) means the kernel has an empty dirty bitmap for this
> > slot. Don't abort in that case. This appears to solve the bug
> > reported at
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1303926
> >
> > which first showed up with commit b533f658a98325d: fix return check for
> > KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG ioctl
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > kvm-all.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
> > index 82a9119..7b7ea8d 100644
> > --- a/kvm-all.c
> > +++ b/kvm-all.c
> > @@ -441,10 +441,13 @@ static int
> > kvm_physical_sync_dirty_bitmap(MemoryRegionSection *section)
> >
> > d.slot = mem->slot;
> >
> > - if (kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG, &d) == -1) {
> > + ret = kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG, &d);
> > + if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOENT) {
> > DPRINTF("ioctl failed %d\n", errno);
> > ret = -1;
> > break;
> > + } else if (ret < 0) {
> > + ret = 0;
> > }
> >
> > kvm_get_dirty_pages_log_range(section, d.dirty_bitmap);
>
> Should we omit calling kvm_get_dirty_pages_log_range() if there's
> no bitmap from kernel?
If that's something we can know then certainly that'll be better.
It'll save an ioctl and copy_from_user of the whole of &d.
> In particular, do we trust kernel to not
> touch d.dirty_bitmap when it returns ENOENT?
Seems ok, kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log() doesn't change anything
in *log before returning when it finds no dirty_mapslot.
-serge