qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] scsi: Fix migration of scsi sense data


From: Fam Zheng
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] scsi: Fix migration of scsi sense data
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 13:58:24 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)

On Thu, 03/06 09:42, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 06/03/2014 09:26, Fam Zheng ha scritto:
> >c5f52875 changed the size of sense array in vmstate_scsi_device by
> >mistake. This patch restores the old size, and add a subsection for the
> >remaining part of the buffer size. So that migration is not broken.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <address@hidden>
> >---
> > hw/scsi/scsi-bus.c          | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > include/hw/scsi/scsi.h      |  1 +
> > include/migration/vmstate.h |  3 +++
> > 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/hw/scsi/scsi-bus.c b/hw/scsi/scsi-bus.c
> >index 50a0acf..eaad925 100644
> >--- a/hw/scsi/scsi-bus.c
> >+++ b/hw/scsi/scsi-bus.c
> >@@ -1905,6 +1905,26 @@ static const VMStateInfo vmstate_info_scsi_requests = 
> >{
> >     .put  = put_scsi_requests,
> > };
> >
> >+static bool scsi_sense_state_needed(void *opaque)
> >+{
> >+    SCSIDevice *s = opaque;
> >+
> >+    return s->sense_len > SCSI_SENSE_BUF_SIZE_OLD;
> >+}
> >+
> >+static const VMStateDescription vmstate_scsi_sense_state = {
> >+    .name = "SCSIDevice/sense",
> >+    .version_id = 1,
> >+    .minimum_version_id = 1,
> >+    .minimum_version_id_old = 1,
> >+    .fields      = (VMStateField []) {
> >+        VMSTATE_UINT8_SUB_ARRAY(sense, SCSIDevice,
> >+                                SCSI_SENSE_BUF_SIZE_OLD,
> >+                                SCSI_SENSE_BUF_SIZE - 
> >SCSI_SENSE_BUF_SIZE_OLD),
> >+        VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
> >+    }
> >+};
> >+
> > const VMStateDescription vmstate_scsi_device = {
> >     .name = "SCSIDevice",
> >     .version_id = 1,
> >@@ -1915,7 +1935,7 @@ const VMStateDescription vmstate_scsi_device = {
> >         VMSTATE_UINT8(unit_attention.asc, SCSIDevice),
> >         VMSTATE_UINT8(unit_attention.ascq, SCSIDevice),
> >         VMSTATE_BOOL(sense_is_ua, SCSIDevice),
> >-        VMSTATE_UINT8_ARRAY(sense, SCSIDevice, SCSI_SENSE_BUF_SIZE),
> >+        VMSTATE_UINT8_SUB_ARRAY(sense, SCSIDevice, 0, 
> >SCSI_SENSE_BUF_SIZE_OLD),
> >         VMSTATE_UINT32(sense_len, SCSIDevice),
> >         {
> >             .name         = "requests",
> >@@ -1927,6 +1947,14 @@ const VMStateDescription vmstate_scsi_device = {
> >             .offset       = 0,
> >         },
> >         VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
> >+    },
> >+    .subsections = (VMStateSubsection []) {
> >+        {
> >+            .vmsd = &vmstate_scsi_sense_state,
> >+            .needed = scsi_sense_state_needed,
> >+        }, {
> >+            /* empty */
> >+        }
> >     }
> > };
> >
> >diff --git a/include/hw/scsi/scsi.h b/include/hw/scsi/scsi.h
> >index e5fc39d..1adb549 100644
> >--- a/include/hw/scsi/scsi.h
> >+++ b/include/hw/scsi/scsi.h
> >@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ typedef struct SCSISense {
> >     uint8_t ascq;
> > } SCSISense;
> >
> >+#define SCSI_SENSE_BUF_SIZE_OLD 96
> > #define SCSI_SENSE_BUF_SIZE 252
> >
> > struct SCSICommand {
> >diff --git a/include/migration/vmstate.h b/include/migration/vmstate.h
> >index ded8e23..e7e1705 100644
> >--- a/include/migration/vmstate.h
> >+++ b/include/migration/vmstate.h
> >@@ -650,6 +650,9 @@ extern const VMStateInfo vmstate_info_bitmap;
> > #define VMSTATE_UINT8_ARRAY(_f, _s, _n)                               \
> >     VMSTATE_UINT8_ARRAY_V(_f, _s, _n, 0)
> >
> >+#define VMSTATE_UINT8_SUB_ARRAY(_f, _s, _start, _num)                \
> >+    VMSTATE_SUB_ARRAY(_f, _s, _start, _num, 0, vmstate_info_uint8, uint8_t)
> >+
> > #define VMSTATE_UINT8_2DARRAY(_f, _s, _n1, _n2)                       \
> >     VMSTATE_UINT8_2DARRAY_V(_f, _s, _n1, _n2, 0)
> >
> >
> 
> Looks good, thanks!  I'll apply to scsi-next after a little more testing.
> 

Ping. Should we take this in 2.0?

Thanks,
Fam



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]