qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 4/7] Add domain socket communication for vhos


From: Antonios Motakis
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 4/7] Add domain socket communication for vhost-user backend
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:09:23 +0100

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 03:59:58PM +0100, Antonios Motakis wrote:
>> Add structures for passing vhost-user messages over a unix domain socket.
>> This is the equivalent of the existing vhost-kernel ioctls.
>>
>> Connect to the named unix domain socket. The system call sendmsg
>> is used for communication. To be able to pass file descriptors
>> between processes - we use SCM_RIGHTS type in the message control header.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Antonios Motakis <address@hidden>
>> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Nikolaev <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  hw/virtio/vhost-backend.c | 268 
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 263 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-backend.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-backend.c
>> index 1d83e1d..b33d35f 100644
>> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-backend.c
>> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-backend.c
>> @@ -11,34 +11,292 @@
>>  #include "hw/virtio/vhost.h"
>>  #include "hw/virtio/vhost-backend.h"
>>  #include "qemu/error-report.h"
>> +#include "qemu/sockets.h"
>>
>>  #include <fcntl.h>
>>  #include <unistd.h>
>>  #include <sys/ioctl.h>
>> +#include <sys/socket.h>
>> +#include <sys/un.h>
>> +#include <linux/vhost.h>
>> +
>> +#define VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS    8
>> +#define VHOST_USER_SOCKTO            (300) /* msec */
>> +
>> +typedef enum VhostUserRequest {
>> +    VHOST_USER_NONE = 0,
>> +    VHOST_USER_GET_FEATURES = 1,
>> +    VHOST_USER_SET_FEATURES = 2,
>> +    VHOST_USER_SET_OWNER = 3,
>> +    VHOST_USER_RESET_OWNER = 4,
>> +    VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE = 5,
>> +    VHOST_USER_SET_LOG_BASE = 6,
>> +    VHOST_USER_SET_LOG_FD = 7,
>> +    VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_NUM = 8,
>> +    VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_ADDR = 9,
>> +    VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_BASE = 10,
>> +    VHOST_USER_GET_VRING_BASE = 11,
>> +    VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_KICK = 12,
>> +    VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_CALL = 13,
>> +    VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_ERR = 14,
>> +    VHOST_USER_NET_SET_BACKEND = 15,
>> +    VHOST_USER_ECHO = 16,
>> +    VHOST_USER_MAX
>> +} VhostUserRequest;
>> +
>> +typedef struct VhostUserMemoryRegion {
>> +    __u64 guest_phys_addr;
>> +    __u64 memory_size;
>> +    __u64 userspace_addr;
>
> Don't use __uXX like this.
> Use posix uintXX_t types.
>
>> +} VhostUserMemoryRegion;
>> +
>> +typedef struct VhostUserMemory {
>> +    __u32 nregions;
>> +    __u32 padding;
>> +    VhostUserMemoryRegion regions[VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS];
>> +} VhostUserMemory;
>> +
>> +typedef struct VhostUserMsg {
>> +    VhostUserRequest request;
>> +
>> +#define VHOST_USER_VERSION_MASK     (0x3)
>> +#define VHOST_USER_REPLY_MASK       (0x1<<2)
>> +    __u32 flags;
>> +    __u32 size; /* the following payload size */
>> +    union {
>> +        __u64 u64;
>> +        int fd;
>> +        struct vhost_vring_state state;
>> +        struct vhost_vring_addr addr;
>> +        struct vhost_vring_file file;
>
> Hmm I don't get it. fd is passes in anciliarry data, right?
> what are the fd #s doing in data portion?
>
>> +        VhostUserMemory memory;
>> +    };
>> +} QEMU_PACKED VhostUserMsg;
>> +
>> +#define MEMB_SIZE(t, m)     (sizeof(((t *)0)->m))
>
> That's unnecessarily tricky.
> Just do
>
> static VhostUserMsg m;
>
> And then you can use sizeof(m.request) without issues and macros.
>
>> +#define VHOST_USER_HDR_SIZE (MEMB_SIZE(VhostUserMsg, request) \
>> +                            + MEMB_SIZE(VhostUserMsg, flags) \
>> +                            + MEMB_SIZE(VhostUserMsg, size))
>
> or just split header to a separate structure and use sizeof on that.
>
>> +
>> +/* The version of the protocol we support */
>> +#define VHOST_USER_VERSION    (0x1)
>> +
>> +static int vhost_user_cleanup(struct vhost_dev *dev);
>
> dont forward declare static functions.
> order them logically instead.
>
>> +
>> +static int vhost_user_recv(int fd, VhostUserMsg *msg)
>> +{
>> +    ssize_t r;
>> +    __u8 *p = (__u8 *)msg;
>> +
>> +    /* read the header */
>> +    do {
>> +        r = read(fd, p, VHOST_USER_HDR_SIZE);
>> +    } while (r < 0 && errno == EINTR);
>
> What if you get a partial buffer?
> You use SOCK_STREAM so I think it can happen right?
>
>
>> +
>> +    if (r > 0) {
>> +        p += VHOST_USER_HDR_SIZE;
>> +        /* read the payload */
>> +        do {
>> +            r = read(fd, p, msg->size);
>> +        } while (r < 0 && errno == EINTR);
>
> That's a security bug.
> What if msg->size is bigger than sizeof *msg?
> you will corrupt memory.
> You must validate size.
>
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (r < 0) {
>> +        error_report("Failed to read msg, reason: %s\n", strerror(errno));
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return (r < 0) ? -1 : 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int vhost_user_send_fds(int fd, const VhostUserMsg *msg, int *fds,
>> +        size_t fd_num)
>> +{
>> +    int r;
>> +
>> +    struct msghdr msgh;
>> +    struct iovec iov[1];
>
> same as struct iovec iov only longer and more confusing?
>> +
>> +    size_t fd_size = fd_num * sizeof(int);
>> +    char control[CMSG_SPACE(fd_size)];
>> +    struct cmsghdr *cmsg;
>> +
>> +    memset(&msgh, 0, sizeof(msgh));
>> +    memset(control, 0, sizeof(control));
>> +
>> +    /* set the payload */
>> +    iov[0].iov_base = (void *)msg;
>
> it's void * already, no need for cast
>
>> +    iov[0].iov_len = VHOST_USER_HDR_SIZE + msg->size;
>> +
>> +    msgh.msg_iov = iov;
>> +    msgh.msg_iovlen = 1;
>> +
>> +    if (fd_num) {
>> +        msgh.msg_control = control;
>> +        msgh.msg_controllen = sizeof(control);
>> +
>> +        cmsg = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(&msgh);
>> +
>> +        cmsg->cmsg_len = CMSG_LEN(fd_size);
>> +        cmsg->cmsg_level = SOL_SOCKET;
>> +        cmsg->cmsg_type = SCM_RIGHTS;
>> +        memcpy(CMSG_DATA(cmsg), fds, fd_size);
>> +    } else {
>> +        msgh.msg_control = 0;
>> +        msgh.msg_controllen = 0;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    do {
>> +        r = sendmsg(fd, &msgh, 0);
>> +    } while (r < 0 && errno == EINTR);
>
> again I think this can write message partially for SOCK_STREAM.
>
>> +
>> +    if (r < 0) {
>> +        error_report("Failed to send msg(%d), reason: %s\n",
>> +                msg->request, strerror(errno));
>> +    } else {
>> +        r = 0;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return r;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int vhost_user_echo(struct vhost_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> +    VhostUserMsg msg;
>> +    int fd = dev->control;
>> +
>> +    if (fd < 0) {
>> +        return -1;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    /* check connection */
>> +    msg.request = VHOST_USER_ECHO;
>> +    msg.flags = VHOST_USER_VERSION;
>> +    msg.size = 0;
>> +
>> +    if (vhost_user_send_fds(fd, &msg, 0, 0) < 0) {
>> +        error_report("ECHO failed\n");
>> +        return -1;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (vhost_user_recv(fd, &msg) < 0) {
>> +        error_report("ECHO failed\n");
>> +        return -1;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if ((msg.flags & VHOST_USER_REPLY_MASK) == 0 ||
>> +        (msg.flags & VHOST_USER_VERSION_MASK) != VHOST_USER_VERSION) {
>> +        error_report("ECHO failed\n");
>> +        return -1;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>>
>>  static int vhost_user_call(struct vhost_dev *dev, unsigned long int request,
>>          void *arg)
>>  {
>> +    int fd = dev->control;
>> +    VhostUserMsg msg;
>> +    int result = 0;
>> +    int fds[VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS];
>> +    size_t fd_num = 0;
>> +
>>      assert(dev->vhost_ops->backend_type == VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_USER);
>> -    error_report("vhost_user_call not implemented\n");
>>
>> -    return -1;
>> +    if (fd < 0) {
>> +        return -1;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    msg.request = VHOST_USER_NONE;
>> +    msg.flags = VHOST_USER_VERSION;
>> +    msg.size = 0;
>> +
>> +    switch (request) {
>> +    default:
>> +        error_report("vhost-user trying to send unhandled ioctl\n");
>> +        return -1;
>> +        break;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    result = vhost_user_send_fds(fd, &msg, fds, fd_num);
>> +
>> +    return result;
>>  }
>>
>>  static int vhost_user_init(struct vhost_dev *dev, const char *devpath)
>>  {
>> +    int fd = -1;
>> +    struct sockaddr_un un;
>> +    struct timeval tv;
>> +    size_t len;
>> +
>>      assert(dev->vhost_ops->backend_type == VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_USER);
>> -    error_report("vhost_user_init not implemented\n");
>>
>> +    /* Create the socket */
>> +    fd = qemu_socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
>> +    if (fd == -1) {
>> +        error_report("socket: %s", strerror(errno));
>> +        return -1;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    /* Set socket options */
>> +    tv.tv_sec = VHOST_USER_SOCKTO / 1000;
>> +    tv.tv_usec = (VHOST_USER_SOCKTO % 1000) * 1000;
>> +
>> +    if (setsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDTIMEO, &tv, sizeof(struct timeval))
>> +            == -1) {
>> +        error_report("setsockopt SO_SNDTIMEO: %s", strerror(errno));
>> +        goto fail;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (setsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO, &tv, sizeof(struct timeval))
>> +            == -1) {
>> +        error_report("setsockopt SO_RCVTIMEO: %s", strerror(errno));
>> +        goto fail;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    /* Connect */
>> +    un.sun_family = AF_UNIX;
>> +    strcpy(un.sun_path, devpath);
>> +
>> +    len = sizeof(un.sun_family) + strlen(devpath);
>> +
>> +    if (connect(fd, (struct sockaddr *) &un, len) == -1) {
>> +        error_report("connect: %s", strerror(errno));
>> +        goto fail;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    /* Cleanup if there is previous connection left */
>> +    if (dev->control >= 0) {
>> +        vhost_user_cleanup(dev);
>> +    }
>> +    dev->control = fd;
>> +
>> +    if (vhost_user_echo(dev) < 0) {
>> +        dev->control = -1;
>> +        goto fail;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return fd;
>> +
>> +fail:
>> +    close(fd);
>>      return -1;
>> +
>>  }
>>
>>  static int vhost_user_cleanup(struct vhost_dev *dev)
>>  {
>> +    int r = 0;
>> +
>>      assert(dev->vhost_ops->backend_type == VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_USER);
>> -    error_report("vhost_user_cleanup not implemented\n");
>>
>> -    return -1;
>> +    if (dev->control >= 0) {
>> +        r = close(dev->control);
>> +    }
>> +    dev->control = -1;
>> +
>> +    return r;
>>  }
>>
>>  static const VhostOps user_ops = {
>> --
>> 1.8.3.2
>>

Ack, thanks for your feeedback.

Best regards,
Antonios



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]