[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/9] pc: ACPI: expose PRST IO range via _CRS
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/9] pc: ACPI: expose PRST IO range via _CRS |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Jan 2014 18:50:42 +0200 |
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 11:30:50PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> .. so OSPM could notice resource conflict if there is any.
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> ---
> hw/i386/acpi-dsdt-cpu-hotplug.dsl | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-dsdt-cpu-hotplug.dsl
> b/hw/i386/acpi-dsdt-cpu-hotplug.dsl
> index 1dfbb4f..869aa00 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-dsdt-cpu-hotplug.dsl
> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-dsdt-cpu-hotplug.dsl
> @@ -52,7 +52,8 @@ Scope(\_SB) {
> Sleep(200)
> }
>
> - OperationRegion(PRST, SystemIO, CPU_STATUS_BASE, 32)
> +#define CPU_STATUS_LEN 32
> + OperationRegion(PRST, SystemIO, CPU_STATUS_BASE, CPU_STATUS_LEN)
> Field(PRST, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve) {
> PRS, 256
> }
> @@ -89,4 +90,12 @@ Scope(\_SB) {
> Increment(Local0)
> }
> }
> +
> + Device(PRES) {
How about
#define CPU_HOTPLUG_RESOURCE_DEVICE PRES
or something?
> + Name(_HID, "ACPI0004")
Does this need to be marked as hidden with _STA?
> +
> + Name(_CRS, ResourceTemplate() {
> + IO(Decode16, CPU_STATUS_BASE, CPU_STATUS_BASE, 0, CPU_STATUS_LEN)
> + })
> + }
> }
> --
> 1.8.4.2
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/9] pc: ACPI: expose PRST IO range via _CRS,
Michael S. Tsirkin <=