qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] vhost-net issue: does not survive reboot on ppc64


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] vhost-net issue: does not survive reboot on ppc64
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 17:43:31 +0200

On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 01:15:29AM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 12/24/2013 08:40 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 02:09:07PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >> On 12/24/2013 03:24 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 02:01:13AM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >>>> On 12/23/2013 01:46 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >>>>> On 12/22/2013 09:56 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>>>> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 02:01:23AM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hi!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I am having a problem with virtio-net + vhost on POWER7 machine - it 
> >>>>>>> does
> >>>>>>> not survive reboot of the guest.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Steps to reproduce:
> >>>>>>> 1. boot the guest
> >>>>>>> 2. configure eth0 and do ping - everything works
> >>>>>>> 3. reboot the guest (i.e. type "reboot")
> >>>>>>> 4. when it is booted, eth0 can be configured but will not work at all.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The test is:
> >>>>>>> ifconfig eth0 172.20.1.2 up
> >>>>>>> ping 172.20.1.23
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If to run tcpdump on the host's "tap-id3" interface, it shows no 
> >>>>>>> trafic
> >>>>>>> coming from the guest. If to compare how it works before and after 
> >>>>>>> reboot,
> >>>>>>> I can see the guest doing an ARP request for 172.20.1.23 and receives 
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>> response and it does the same after reboot but the answer does not 
> >>>>>>> come.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So you see the arp packet in guest but not in host?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> One thing to try is to boot debug kernel - where pr_debug is
> >>>>>> enabled - then you might see some errors in the kernel log.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tried and added lot more debug printk myself, not clear at all what is
> >>>>> happening there.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> One more hint - if I boot the guest and the guest does not bring eth0 up
> >>>>> AND wait more than 200 seconds (and less than 210 seconds), then eth0 
> >>>>> will
> >>>>> not work at all. I.e. this script produces not-working-eth0:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ifconfig eth0 172.20.1.2 down
> >>>>> sleep 210
> >>>>> ifconfig eth0 172.20.1.2 up
> >>>>> ping 172.20.1.23
> >>>>>
> >>>>> s/210/200/ - and it starts working. No reboot is required to reproduce.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No "vhost" == always works. The only difference I can see here is 
> >>>>> vhost's
> >>>>> thread which may get suspended if not used for a while after the start 
> >>>>> and
> >>>>> does not wake up but this is almost a blind guess.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Yet another clue - this host kernel patch seems to help with the guest
> >>>> reboot but does not help with the initial 210 seconds delay:
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> >>>> index 69068e0..5e67650 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> >>>> @@ -162,10 +162,10 @@ void vhost_work_queue(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct
> >>>> vhost_work *work)
> >>>>                 list_add_tail(&work->node, &dev->work_list);
> >>>>                 work->queue_seq++;
> >>>>                 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->work_lock, flags);
> >>>> -               wake_up_process(dev->worker);
> >>>>         } else {
> >>>>                 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->work_lock, flags);
> >>>>         }
> >>>> +       wake_up_process(dev->worker);
> >>>>  }
> >>>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_work_queue);
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Interesting. Some kind of race? A missing memory barrier somewhere?
> >>
> >> I do not see how. I boot the guest and just wait 210 seconds, nothing
> >> happens to cause races.
> >>
> >>
> >>> Since it's all around startup,
> >>> you can try kicking the host eventfd in
> >>> vhost_net_start.
> >>
> >>
> >> How exactly? This did not help. Thanks.
> >>
> >> diff --git a/hw/net/vhost_net.c b/hw/net/vhost_net.c
> >> index 006576d..407ecf2 100644
> >> --- a/hw/net/vhost_net.c
> >> +++ b/hw/net/vhost_net.c
> >> @@ -229,6 +229,17 @@ int vhost_net_start(VirtIODevice *dev, NetClientState
> >> *ncs,
> >>          if (r < 0) {
> >>              goto err;
> >>          }
> >> +
> >> +        VHostNetState *vn = tap_get_vhost_net(ncs[i].peer);
> >> +        struct vhost_vring_file file = {
> >> +            .index = i
> >> +        };
> >> +        file.fd =
> >> event_notifier_get_fd(virtio_queue_get_host_notifier(dev->vq));
> >> +        r = ioctl(vn->dev.control, VHOST_SET_VRING_KICK, &file);
> > 
> > No, this sets the notifier, it does not kick.
> > To kick you write 1 there:
> >     uint6_t  v = 1;
> >     write(fd, &v, sizeof v);
> 
> 
> Please, be precise. How/where do I get that @fd? Is what I do correct?

Yes.

> What
> is uint6_t - uint8_t or uint16_t (neither works)?

Sorry, should have been uint64_t.

> May be it is a missing barrier - I rebooted machine several times and now
> sometime after even 240 seconds (not 210 as before) it works (but most of
> the time still does not)...
> 
> 
> >> +        if (r) {
> >> +            error_report("Error notifiyng host notifier: %d", -r);
> >> +            goto err;
> >> +        }
> >>      }
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> If to remove vhost=on, it is all good. If to try Fedora19
> >>>>>>> (v3.10-something), it all good again - works before and after reboot.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> And there 2 questions:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 1. does anybody have any clue what might go wrong after reboot?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 2. Is there any good material to read about what exactly and how vhost
> >>>>>>> accelerates?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> My understanding is that packets from the guest to the real network 
> >>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>> going as:
> >>>>>>> 1. guest's virtio-pci-net does ioport(VIRTIO_PCI_QUEUE_NOTIFY)
> >>>>>>> 2. QEMU's net/virtio-net.c calls qemu_net_queue_deliver()
> >>>>>>> 3. QEMU's net/tap.c calls tap_write_packet() and this is how the host 
> >>>>>>> knows
> >>>>>>> that there is a new packet.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What about the documentation? :) or the idea?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This how I run QEMU:
> >>>>>>> ./qemu-system-ppc64 \
> >>>>>>> -enable-kvm \
> >>>>>>> -m 2048 \
> >>>>>>> -machine pseries \
> >>>>>>> -initrd 1.cpio \
> >>>>>>> -kernel vml312_virtio_net_dbg \
> >>>>>>> -nographic \
> >>>>>>> -vga none \
> >>>>>>> -netdev
> >>>>>>> tap,id=id3,ifname=tap-id3,script=ifup.sh,downscript=ifdown.sh,vhost=on
> >>>>>>>  \
> >>>>>>> -device virtio-net-pci,id=id4,netdev=id3,mac=C0:41:49:4b:00:00
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> That is bridge config:
> >>>>>>> address@hidden ~]$ brctl show
> >>>>>>> bridge name   bridge id               STP enabled     interfaces
> >>>>>>> brtest                8000.00145e992e88       no      pin     eth4
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The ifup.sh script:
> >>>>>>> ifconfig $1 hw ether ee:01:02:03:04:05
> >>>>>>> /sbin/ifconfig $1 up
> >>>>>>> /usr/sbin/brctl addif brtest $1
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Alexey



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]