[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [migration] questions about removing the old block-migr
From: |
Stefan Hajnoczi |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [migration] questions about removing the old block-migration code |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:33:46 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 01:17:17AM +0000, Zhanghaoyu (A) wrote:
> >> I read below words on the report of <KVM Live Migration: Weather
> >> forecast (May 29, 2013)>, We were going to remove the old
> >> block-migration code Then people fixed it
> >> Good: it works now
> >> Bad: We have to maintain both
> >> It uses the same port than migration
> >> You need to migrate all/none of block devices
> >>
> >> The old block-migration code said above is that in block-migration.c?
> >
> >Yes.
> >
> >> What are the reasons of removing the old block-migration code? Buggy
> >> implementation? Or need to migrate all/none of block devices?
> >
> >Buggy and tightly coupled with the live migration code, making it hard to
> >modify either area independently.
>
> Thanks a lot for explaining.
> Till now, we still use the old block-migration code in our virtualization
> solution.
> Could you detail the bugs that the old block-migration code have?
Please use git log block-migration.c to see bugs that have been fixed.
The basic problem is that block-migration.c hasn't been actively
maintained or used much. My impression is that the newer block
migration approach using drive-mirror now has more developer and testing
focus (see libvirt if you're curious how drive-mirror can be
orchestrated).
Stefan