Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] spapr: make sure RMA is in first mode of first memory node

[Alexander Graf]

On 01.11.2013, at 11:21, Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden> wrote:

> SLOF gets really confused if RTAS/device-tree and everything else
> what SLOF can use is not in the very first block of the very first
> memory node.
> 
> This makes sure that the RMA area is where SLOF expects it to be.
> 
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <address@hidden>
> Cc: Nikunj A Dadhania <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden>
> ---
> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> index 09dc635..09a5d94 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> @@ -1113,7 +1113,7 @@ static void ppc_spapr_init(QEMUMachineInitArgs *args)
>     int i;
>     MemoryRegion *sysmem = get_system_memory();
>     MemoryRegion *ram = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> -    hwaddr rma_alloc_size;
> +    hwaddr rma_alloc_size, node0_size;
>     uint32_t initrd_base = 0;
>     long kernel_size = 0, initrd_size = 0;
>     long load_limit, rtas_limit, fw_size;
> @@ -1154,6 +1154,12 @@ static void ppc_spapr_init(QEMUMachineInitArgs *args)
>             spapr->rma_size = MIN(spapr->rma_size, 0x10000000);
>         }
>     }
> +    /*
> +     * SLOF gets confused if RMA resides not in the first block
> +     * of the first memory node so let's fix it.
> +     */
> +    node0_size = (nb_numa_nodes > 1) ? node_mem[0] : ram_size;
> +    spapr->rma_size = MIN(spapr->rma_size, node0_size);

So if I create a NUMA node of 4MB that will be my RMA? That sounds pretty 
broken, especially on 970.

Why does SLOF have any issues with NUMA memory nodes? It can just ignore them, 
no?


Alex