Re: [Qemu-devel] Why is TYPE_CPU no-user? (was: [PATCH RFC 0/9] Clean up

qemu-devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Why is TYPE_CPU no-user? (was: [PATCH RFC 0/9] Clean up

From:	Peter Maydell
Subject:	Re: [Qemu-devel] Why is TYPE_CPU no-user? (was: [PATCH RFC 0/9] Clean up and fix no_user)
Date:	Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:37:39 +0100

On 15 October 2013 13:24, Markus Armbruster <address@hidden> wrote:
> To go beyond RFC with this series, I need to explain why TYPE_CPU
> cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet.

...isn't this just because it's an abstract type?

-- PMM

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[Qemu-devel] Should the i8259 devices remain no-user? (was: [PATCH RFC 8/9] isa: Clean up use of cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet), (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 5/9] ich9: Document why cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet, armbru, 2013/10/10
  - Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 5/9] ich9: Document why cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet, Paolo Bonzini, 2013/10/10
    - Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 5/9] ich9: Document why cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet, Paolo Bonzini, 2013/10/10
    - Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 5/9] ich9: Document why cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet, Markus Armbruster, 2013/10/11
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 6/9] piix3 piix4: Document why cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet, armbru, 2013/10/10
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 7/9] vt82c686: Document why cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet, armbru, 2013/10/10
- [Qemu-devel] Why is TYPE_CPU no-user? (was: [PATCH RFC 0/9] Clean up and fix no_user), Markus Armbruster, 2013/10/15
  - Re: [Qemu-devel] Why is TYPE_CPU no-user? (was: [PATCH RFC 0/9] Clean up and fix no_user), Peter Maydell <=
    - Re: [Qemu-devel] Why is TYPE_CPU no-user?, Markus Armbruster, 2013/10/15
  - Re: [Qemu-devel] Why is TYPE_CPU no-user?, Andreas Färber, 2013/10/15
    - Re: [Qemu-devel] Why is TYPE_CPU no-user?, Markus Armbruster, 2013/10/16
- [Qemu-devel] Which functions of southbridges should be no-user? (was: [PATCH RFC 0/9] Clean up and fix no_user), Markus Armbruster, 2013/10/15
  - Re: [Qemu-devel] Which functions of southbridges should be no-user?, Andreas Färber, 2013/10/15
    - Re: [Qemu-devel] Which functions of southbridges should be no-user?, Kevin Wolf, 2013/10/15
    - Re: [Qemu-devel] Which functions of southbridges should be no-user?, Andreas Färber, 2013/10/15
    - Re: [Qemu-devel] Which functions of southbridges should be no-user?, Markus Armbruster, 2013/10/16
    - Re: [Qemu-devel] Which functions of southbridges should be no-user?, Anthony Liguori, 2013/10/15
    - Re: [Qemu-devel] Which functions of southbridges should be no-user?, Markus Armbruster, 2013/10/16

Prev by Date: Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] [PATCH v2] map 64-bit PCI BARs at location provided by emulator
Next by Date: Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] qemu 1.7 & seabios -- release planning
Previous by thread: [Qemu-devel] Why is TYPE_CPU no-user? (was: [PATCH RFC 0/9] Clean up and fix no_user)
Next by thread: Re: [Qemu-devel] Why is TYPE_CPU no-user?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread