[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 for 1.6 0/8] Guest memory allocation fixes &
From: |
Stefan Weil |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 for 1.6 0/8] Guest memory allocation fixes & cleanup |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Sep 2013 17:15:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 |
Am 31.07.2013 15:11, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
> All I wanted to do is exit(1) instead of abort() on guest memory
> allocation failure [07/08]. But that lead me into a minor #ifdef bog,
> and here's what I brought back. Enjoy!
>
> Testing:
> * Christian Borntraeger reports v1 works fine under LPAR (new S390
> KVM, i.e. generic allocation) and as second guest under z/VM (old
> S390 KVM, i.e. legacy S390 allocation). Thanks for testing, and for
> catching a stupid mistake. v2 differs from v1 only in code that
> isn't reachable on S390.
>
> Changes since v2:
> * Straightforward rebase, only 4/8 conflicted
> Changes since v1:
> * 5/8: Fix assertion in qemu_ram_remap() (Paolo)
> * All other patches unchanged except for Acked-by in commit messages
> Changes since RFC:
> * 1-3+8/8 unchanged except for commit message tweaks
> * 4+6/8 rewritten to address Paolo's review
> * 5/8 rewritten: don't fix dead code, just assert it's dead
> * 7/8 fix mistakes caught by Richard Henderson and Peter Maydell
>
> Markus Armbruster (8):
> exec: Fix Xen RAM allocation with unusual options
> exec: Clean up fall back when -mem-path allocation fails
> exec: Reduce ifdeffery around -mem-path
> exec: Simplify the guest physical memory allocation hook
> exec: Drop incorrect & dead S390 code in qemu_ram_remap()
> exec: Clean up unnecessary S390 ifdeffery
> exec: Don't abort when we can't allocate guest memory
> pc_sysfw: Fix ISA BIOS init for ridiculously big flash
>
> exec.c | 120
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> hw/block/pc_sysfw.c | 5 +-
> include/exec/cpu-all.h | 2 -
> include/exec/exec-all.h | 2 +
> include/sysemu/kvm.h | 5 --
> kvm-all.c | 13 ------
> target-s390x/kvm.c | 23 +++-------
> util/oslib-posix.c | 4 +-
> util/oslib-win32.c | 5 +-
> 9 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
Two patches from this series seem to cause compiler errors
in latest QEMU ona 32 bit Ubuntu precise host:
CC arm-softmmu/exec.o
exec.c:752:51: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type
[-Werror]
exec.c: In function 'qemu_ram_alloc_from_ptr':
exec.c:1139:32: error: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
[-Werror]
exec.c: In function 'qemu_ram_remap':
exec.c:1283:21: error: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
[-Werror]
There is a mismatch of function prototypes (size_t <-> ram_addr_t):
void *qemu_anon_ram_alloc(size_t size);
static void *(*phys_mem_alloc)(ram_addr_t size) = qemu_anon_ram_alloc;
It's strange that the buildbots don't complain.
Stefan
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 for 1.6 0/8] Guest memory allocation fixes & cleanup,
Stefan Weil <=