Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] rdma: constify ram_chunk_{index, start, end}

[Isaku Yamahata]

On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:28:51AM -0400, Michael R. Hines wrote:
> On 09/03/2013 10:32 PM, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>   migration-rdma.c |    8 +++++---
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/migration-rdma.c b/migration-rdma.c
>> index e71c10a..db5a908 100644
>> --- a/migration-rdma.c
>> +++ b/migration-rdma.c
>> @@ -511,19 +511,21 @@ static int qemu_rdma_exchange_send(RDMAContext *rdma, 
>> RDMAControlHeader *head,
>>                                      int *resp_idx,
>>                                      int (*callback)(RDMAContext *rdma));
>>
>> -static inline uint64_t ram_chunk_index(uint8_t *start, uint8_t *host)
>> +static inline uint64_t ram_chunk_index(const uint8_t *start,
>> +                                       const uint8_t *host)
>>   {
>>       return ((uintptr_t) host - (uintptr_t) start) >> RDMA_REG_CHUNK_SHIFT;
>>   }
>>
>> -static inline uint8_t *ram_chunk_start(RDMALocalBlock *rdma_ram_block,
>> +static inline uint8_t *ram_chunk_start(const RDMALocalBlock *rdma_ram_block,
>>                                          uint64_t i)
>>   {
>>       return (uint8_t *) (((uintptr_t) rdma_ram_block->local_host_addr)
>>                                       + (i << RDMA_REG_CHUNK_SHIFT));
>>   }
>>
>> -static inline uint8_t *ram_chunk_end(RDMALocalBlock *rdma_ram_block, 
>> uint64_t i)
>> +static inline uint8_t *ram_chunk_end(const RDMALocalBlock *rdma_ram_block,
>> +                                     uint64_t i)
>>   {
>>       uint8_t *result = ram_chunk_start(rdma_ram_block, i) +
>>                                            (1UL << RDMA_REG_CHUNK_SHIFT);
>
> Isaku, you are sending lots of "little" patches which may or may not be
> properly rebased upon previous patches.
>
> Could you please group your current patch series into a single series with a
> descriptive cover letter along with the previous patches?
>
> If you need create a new patch specifically for RDMA before a previous
> patch as been applied to my tree, then please include the old one into
> the new patch series with a description and a "resend" in the title.
>
> Then I can review them at once apply them all to my tree
> so the maintaner has an easier time.

Okay, will do. Which branch should I watch?
I'm aware of the following repo, but I'm not sure which branch to rebase.
https://github.com/hinesmr/qemu.git

thanks,

>
> Thanks,
> - Michael
>
>

-- 
yamahata