[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] vm performance degradation after kvm live migration or
From: |
Zhanghaoyu (A) |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] vm performance degradation after kvm live migration or save-restore with ETP enabled |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Jul 2013 07:47:49 +0000 |
>> hi all,
>>
>> I met similar problem to these, while performing live migration or
>> save-restore test on the kvm platform (qemu:1.4.0, host:suse11sp2,
>> guest:suse11sp2), running tele-communication software suite in guest,
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-05/msg00098.html
>> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/102506
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/100592
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58771
>>
>> After live migration or virsh restore [savefile], one process's CPU
>> utilization went up by about 30%, resulted in throughput degradation
>> of this process.
>>
>> If EPT disabled, this problem gone.
>>
>> I suspect that kvm hypervisor has business with this problem.
>> Based on above suspect, I want to find the two adjacent versions of
>> kvm-kmod which triggers this problem or not (e.g. 2.6.39, 3.0-rc1),
>> and analyze the differences between this two versions, or apply the
>> patches between this two versions by bisection method, finally find the key
>> patches.
>>
>> Any better ideas?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Zhang Haoyu
>
>I've attempted to duplicate this on a number of machines that are as similar
>to yours as I am able to get my hands on, and so far have not been able to see
>any performance degradation. And from what I've read in the above links, huge
>pages do not seem to be part of the problem.
>
>So, if you are in a position to bisect the kernel changes, that would probably
>be the best avenue to pursue in my opinion.
>
>Bruce
I found the first bad commit([612819c3c6e67bac8fceaa7cc402f13b1b63f7e4] KVM:
propagate fault r/w information to gup(), allow read-only memory) which
triggers this problem
by git bisecting the kvm kernel (download from
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git) changes.
And,
git log 612819c3c6e67bac8fceaa7cc402f13b1b63f7e4 -n 1 -p >
612819c3c6e67bac8fceaa7cc402f13b1b63f7e4.log
git diff
612819c3c6e67bac8fceaa7cc402f13b1b63f7e4~1..612819c3c6e67bac8fceaa7cc402f13b1b63f7e4
> 612819c3c6e67bac8fceaa7cc402f13b1b63f7e4.diff
Then, I diffed 612819c3c6e67bac8fceaa7cc402f13b1b63f7e4.log and
612819c3c6e67bac8fceaa7cc402f13b1b63f7e4.diff,
came to a conclusion that all of the differences between
612819c3c6e67bac8fceaa7cc402f13b1b63f7e4~1 and
612819c3c6e67bac8fceaa7cc402f13b1b63f7e4
are contributed by no other than 612819c3c6e67bac8fceaa7cc402f13b1b63f7e4, so
this commit is the peace-breaker which directly or indirectly causes the
degradation.
Does the map_writable flag passed to mmu_set_spte() function have effect on
PTE's PAT flag or increase the VMEXITs induced by that guest tried to write
read-only memory?
Thanks,
Zhang Haoyu
- [Qemu-devel] vm performance degradation after kvm live migration or save-restore with ETP enabled, Zhanghaoyu (A), 2013/07/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] vm performance degradation after kvm live migration or save-restore with ETP enabled, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2013/07/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] vm performance degradation after kvm live migration or save-restore with ETP enabled, Gleb Natapov, 2013/07/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] vm performance degradation after kvm live migration or save-restore with ETP enabled, Xiao Guangrong, 2013/07/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] vm performance degradation after kvm live migration or save-restore with ETP enabled, Andreas Färber, 2013/07/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] vm performance degradation after kvm live migration or save-restore with ETP enabled, Bruce Rogers, 2013/07/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] vm performance degradation after kvm live migration or save-restore with ETP enabled,
Zhanghaoyu (A) <=