[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Question] why x2apic's set by default without host sup
From: |
Peter Huang(Peng) |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Question] why x2apic's set by default without host support(on Nehalem CPU). |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jul 2013 10:44:48 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 |
> libvirt's "host-passthrough" uses "-cpu host', and it "-cpu host"
> enables every feature that can be enabled on the host.
>From my test results, I found that even when use host-passthrough mode, VM's
cpu features are very different from host, this doesn't match what
host-passthrough
mode's explanation.
libvirt's option exlanation:
With this mode, the CPU visible to the guest should be exactly the same as
the host
CPU even in the aspects that libvirt does not understand.
> If the behavior of "-cpu host" doesn't match libvirt expectations, we
> need to clarify what are the requirements, and maybe have a "try to be
> close to host CPU mode" as opposed to the current "enable everything
> that can be enabled" mode.
Does the results above indicates what you mean to do? or the current way
doesn't work
as we expect.
Thanks!