[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] full introspection support for QMP
From: |
Kevin Wolf |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] full introspection support for QMP |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Jul 2013 17:08:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Am 02.07.2013 um 19:06 hat Anthony Liguori geschrieben:
> Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:
> > On 07/02/2013 08:51 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> Amos Kong <address@hidden> writes:
> >>
> >>> Introduces new monitor command to query QMP schema information,
> >>> the return data is a nested dict/list, it contains the useful
> >>> metadata.
> >>>
> >>> we can add events definations to qapi-schema.json, then it can
> >>> also be queried.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Amos Kong <address@hidden>
> >>
> >> Maybe I'm being too meta here, but why not just return qapi-schema.json
> >> as a string and call it as day?
I know you don't agree with this, but as I mentioned several times
before, I think the schema as returned by the introspection functions
shouldn't contain what a qemu of this version _could_ in theory provide,
but what this specific build actually _does_ provide. It shouldn't
include things that are compiled out.
> > I've also been the one arguing that the additional complexity (an array of
> > {"name":"str","type":"str","optional":bool"}) is better for libvirt in
> > that the JSON is then well-suited for scanning (it is easier to scan
> > through an array where the key is a constant "name", and looking for the
> > value that we are interested in, than it is to scan through a dictionary
> > where the keys of the dictionary are the names we are interested in).
> > That is, the JSON in qapi-schema.json is a nice compact representation
> > that works for humans, but may be a bit TOO compact for handling via
> > machines.
>
> But adding a bunch of code to do JSON translation just adds a bunch of
> additional complexity.
>
> One reasonable compromise would be:
>
> { "command": "foo", "arguments": { "name": "str", "id": "int" },
> "optional": { "bar": "bool" } }
This assumes that optional vs. mandatory is the only property we ever
want to describe for fields. Eric's approach is much more future-proof.
Let's keep the format of qapi-schema.json an implementation detail that
we can change and extend when necessary.
Kevin
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] full introspection support for QMP, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] full introspection support for QMP, Anthony Liguori, 2013/07/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] full introspection support for QMP, Paolo Bonzini, 2013/07/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] full introspection support for QMP, Anthony Liguori, 2013/07/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] full introspection support for QMP, Paolo Bonzini, 2013/07/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] full introspection support for QMP, Anthony Liguori, 2013/07/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] full introspection support for QMP, Paolo Bonzini, 2013/07/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] full introspection support for QMP, Amos Kong, 2013/07/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] full introspection support for QMP, Anthony Liguori, 2013/07/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] full introspection support for QMP, Eric Blake, 2013/07/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] full introspection support for QMP, Anthony Liguori, 2013/07/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] full introspection support for QMP,
Kevin Wolf <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] full introspection support for QMP, Anthony Liguori, 2013/07/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] full introspection support for QMP, Kevin Wolf, 2013/07/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] full introspection support for QMP, Paolo Bonzini, 2013/07/04
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] full introspection support for QMP, Eric Blake, 2013/07/02