[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Citrix PV Bus device
From: |
Paul Durrant |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Citrix PV Bus device |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Jul 2013 08:57:43 +0000 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: 02 July 2013 09:46
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: address@hidden; address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Citrix PV Bus device
>
> >>> On 02.07.13 at 10:39, Paul Durrant <address@hidden> wrote:
> > --- a/include/hw/pci/pci_ids.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/pci/pci_ids.h
> > @@ -151,4 +151,7 @@
> > #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_TEWS 0x1498
> > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_TEWS_TPCI200 0x30C8
> >
> > +#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_CITRIX 0x5853
>
> Is that really the right way to do things, considering that the same
> value is elsewhere used for PCI_VENDOR_ID_XEN?
>
> Jan
>
> > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_CITRIX_PV_BUS 0x0002
> > +
> > #endif
>
I opted to do this for clarity. The fact that the Xen platform device uses
Citrix's vendor ID is historical; I wanted to be clear that this device was
distinct.
Paul
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Citrix PV Bus device, Ian Campbell, 2013/07/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Citrix PV Bus device, Paul Durrant, 2013/07/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Citrix PV Bus device, Ian Campbell, 2013/07/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Citrix PV Bus device, Tim Deegan, 2013/07/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Citrix PV Bus device, Ian Campbell, 2013/07/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Citrix PV Bus device, Paul Durrant, 2013/07/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Citrix PV Bus device, Ian Campbell, 2013/07/02