qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/7] NUMA: parse guest numa nodes memory policy


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/7] NUMA: parse guest numa nodes memory policy
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:39:05 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6

Il 19/06/2013 10:01, Wanlong Gao ha scritto:
> On 06/19/2013 04:19 AM, Bandan Das wrote:
>> Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:20:37AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>> Also, please use QemuOpts instead of yet another homegrown parser.
>>>> Eduardo, I think you had the most recent attempt to convert -numa to
>>>> QemuOpts?
>>>
>>> I had one, but I believe it is more complex than it should have been. I
>>> was creating a "numa-node" config section while keeping "-numa" just for
>>> compatbility, but I don't think we really need to do that.
>>
>> Ah, I was working on an update to Eduardo's earlier proposals for multiple 
>> CPU ranges
>> and part of the change was to convert to QemuOpts. 
>>
>> Probably needs more testing but posted it anyway since we are already 
>> discussing this :
>> [PATCH v3] vl.c: Support multiple CPU ranges on -numa option
>> (hasn't shown up in the archives yet)
> 
> Here is the archive: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/217491
> 
> So, are you all ACK with this? And we are not considering compatible thing by 
> using
> "cpu" instead of "cpus" here?

No; as Eduardo pointed out, the "cpus" must be kept.  But apart from
that, picking up Bandan's patch in v2 of this series should be fine.

Paolo




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]