[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/9] KVM: Don't assume that mpstate exists wi
From: |
Alexander Graf |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/9] KVM: Don't assume that mpstate exists with in-kernel PIC always |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:04:55 +0200 |
On 01.05.2013, at 03:48, Scott Wood wrote:
> From: Alexander Graf <address@hidden>
>
> On PPC, we don't support MP state. So far it's not necessary and I'm
> not convinced yet that we really need to support it ever.
>
> However, the current idle logic in QEMU assumes that an in-kernel PIC
> also means we support MP state. This assumption is not true anymore.
>
> Let's split up the two cases into two different variables. That way
> PPC can expose an in-kernel PIC, while not implementing MP state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <address@hidden>
> CC: Jan Kiszka <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <address@hidden>
Thanks, applied all except 8/9 to ppc-next.
Alex
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/9] KVM: Don't assume that mpstate exists with in-kernel PIC always,
Alexander Graf <=