qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] sheepdog: support 'qemu-img snapshot -a'


From: Liu Yuan
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] sheepdog: support 'qemu-img snapshot -a'
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 21:09:57 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6

On 06/06/2013 08:46 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 06.06.2013 um 13:57 hat Liu Yuan geschrieben:
>> Just call sd_create_branch() to rollback the image is good enough
>>
>> Cc: address@hidden
>> Cc: MORITA Kazutaka <address@hidden>
>> Cc: Kevin Wolf <address@hidden>
>> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden>
>> Signed-off-by: Liu Yuan <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  block/sheepdog.c |    8 +++++---
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/sheepdog.c b/block/sheepdog.c
>> index 94218ac..cb5ca4a 100644
>> --- a/block/sheepdog.c
>> +++ b/block/sheepdog.c
>> @@ -2072,9 +2072,11 @@ static int sd_snapshot_goto(BlockDriverState *bs, 
>> const char *snapshot_id)
>>      }
>>  
>>      if (!s->inode.vm_state_size) {
>> -        error_report("Invalid snapshot");
>> -        ret = -ENOENT;
>> -        goto out;
>> +        /* qemu-img asks us to rollback, we need to do it right now */
>> +        ret = sd_create_branch(s);
>> +        if (ret) {
>> +            goto out;
>> +        }
>>      }
> 
> I'm not sure how snapshots work internally for Sheepdog, but it seems
> odd to me that you need to do this only for disk-only snapshots, but not
> when the snapshot has VM state. (Also, note that 'qemu-img snapshot -a'
> works on images with a VM state, so the comment doesn't seem to be
> completely accurate)
> 
> Would you mind explaining to me how this works in detail?
> 

Hmm, the original code isn't written by me and this snapshot mechanism
exists since day 0. I just hacks it to work now. So I'll try to explain
on my understanding.

When we do a snapshot such as 'savedvm' or 'qemu-img snapshot', the
active vdi is snapshotted and marked as snapshot and a new vdi is
created as copy-on-write on the previous active vdi, then this new vdi
becomes active vdi. For e.g,

As1 --> As2 --> A

We take snapshot of vdi A twice, tagged s1 and s2 respectively. I guess
this is quit similar to qcow2 snapshots, only inode object with a bitmap
is created.

So when we 'loadvm' or 'qemu-img snapshot -a' to A, current logic just
handle 'loadvm', that .bdrv_snapshot_goto only reloads inode object,
that is, for e.g, we 'savevm s1', and mark it as snapshot, the chain
would like

As1 --> As2 --> A
 |
 v
 just reload As1's inode object

Only when the write comes from VM, we do the following stuff
 - delete active vdi A
 - created a new inode based on the previously reloaded As1's inode

The chain will look like:

As1 --> As2
 |
 V
 A

This is how sheepdog handles savevm/loadvm.

So for 'qemu-img snapshot -a', we should create the branch in the
.bdrv_snapshot_goto.

As you pointed out, we need to consider vm state even for 'snapshot -a',
so I need to rework the patch 2/2.

Thanks,
Yuan



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]