[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] sysfw: remove read-only pc_sysfw_flash_vs_r
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] sysfw: remove read-only pc_sysfw_flash_vs_rom_bug_compatible |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Jun 2013 22:57:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6 |
Il 03/06/2013 22:36, Jordan Justen ha scritto:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
>> The variable is not written anymore.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> hw/block/pc_sysfw.c | 26 +-------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/block/pc_sysfw.c b/hw/block/pc_sysfw.c
>> index 412d1b0..c6d4be4 100644
>> --- a/hw/block/pc_sysfw.c
>> +++ b/hw/block/pc_sysfw.c
>> @@ -199,12 +199,6 @@ static void old_pc_system_rom_init(MemoryRegion
>> *rom_memory, bool isapc_ram_fw)
>> bios);
>> }
>>
>> -/*
>> - * Bug-compatible flash vs. ROM selection enabled?
>> - * A few older machines enable this.
>> - */
>> -bool pc_sysfw_flash_vs_rom_bug_compatible;
>
> Hmm. I think we still need this to retain the 1.2-1.5 compatible
> behavior. But, I think I maybe my kvm readonly series didn't properly
> resurrect the pc_sysfw_flash_vs_rom_bug_compatible switch.
No, we shouldn't. It only worked with TCG, and it is simpler to just
document to use -pflash (instead of -bios) to run OVMF. The misfeature
was dropped (with this minor backwards incompatibility) on purpose.
Paolo